CH4 + 2O2 📷 CO2 + 2H2O + Heat
This is a decomposition reaction.
N2 + O2 + Heat = 2NO
endothermic
Endothermic
Endothermic
4nh3 + 5o2 --> 4no + 6h2o
I am conducting a through ivestigation of the combustion of ammonia gas: 4NH3 + 5O2 > 4NO + 6H2O The reaction will be monitored by the pressure of the gases present in a 5.400 L steel chamber that is at 25.00 degrees C initially but 75 degrees C after the reaction. The chamber is initially filled with 21.250 ATM of oqygen (in slight excess) and an additional 16.500 ATM of ammonia. This one just simply stumps me.
Answer 1It is unlikely that humans will ever evolve tails again. Tails help to improve the balance of primates using an above-branch climbing locomotion, and other animals using quadrupedal locomotion techniques. Given that we're bipedal and are likely selected to remain so, it is unlikely that we'll re-evolve a tail unless the environment that we're adapting to changes dramatically. Even if the genes controlling the growth of a tail were to mutate, it would take the additive effects of more than a single mutation to cause a human to have a tail again, and so such genetic changes would likely be lost before they were even observed.Answer 2Hey, you never know!Answer 3It's difficult to predict whether the human race will re-evolve tails. That largely depends on future environmental changes. You really never know. On the other hand, it's unlikely that we'll re-evolve tails, because species usually evolve away from their primitive stages. But there is a rare phenomenon called atavism, which is sometimes observed in humans, where babies are born with a visible coccyx (last vertebral bone or the fused tail bone in humans).Answer 4No, because we never evolved in the first place. It is all a hoax and a brainwashing of the young, via engineered 'evidence'.In fact, Denis Towers discovered the impossibility of evolution in his 10 year study comparing ground snakes with homo sapiens in a published work, "TWO BIRDS ... ONE STONE!!" in 2007. It was concluded, after 10 years of examination, that snakes and homo sapiens present as complete opposites - both, behaviourally and kinesiologically (applied anatomically).1. This discovery implies deliberation of design.2. It also tends to support/validate the Biblical record of the Adam and Eve account, wherein it was the serpent who opposed Man in the Garden of Eden.After the serpent's opposition to Man, God put a curse upon all things - one being that He changed the structure-nature of the serpent. [Genesis 3:14,15]
The balance is 2N2 +2O2= 4NO
s is positive and g i s negative at all temperatures
4NH3(g) + 5O2(g) 4NO(g) + 6H2O(g)
4nh3 + 5o2 --> 4no + 6h2o
Yes ammonia does burn in oxygen. On combustion it forms Nitrogen oxide and water. Reaction involved is-4NH(3) + 5O(2) ---> 4NO + 6H(2)O.
air oxidation of air in an aqueous environment gives NO2 and traces of NO3.and finally gives NO2 and H+ by the result of chemical reaction 4NO + O2 +2H2O--------------------- 4NO2 + 4H+
this is the balanced equation 4NH3 + 5O2 = 4NO + 6H2O
No, use only ATF+4No, use only ATF+4
4NH3 + 5O2 -----> 4NO + 6HOH
No, that's 3/4No, that's 3/4
Four ammonia plus five oxygen molecules yields 4 nitrous oxide plus six water.
nitrogen monoxide and Water The balanced equation is as follow: 4NH3 + 5O2-->4NO + 6H2O