Your question is unclear and cannot be answered as written.
However depending on what you mean by go nuclear I might be able to offer some possible answers:
All of the explosions that have occurred at reactors have been either:
Mainly because the nuclear fuel will not make an explosion, whatever you do with it. The fuel used in PWR and BWR is uranium enriched to about 4-5 percent U-235, whereas a nuclear weapon needs nearly pure U-235 to make an effective explosion. In addition the fuel in a reactor is not assembled into a single mass, it is spread out into a matrix arrangement with spaces for the moderator/coolant between fuel rods, so it could never form a supercritical single shape as required for a weapon.
In short: no.
By far the biggest explosion danger in a nuclear reactor is chemical. During the Three Mile Island incident, one of the major concerns was that a hydrogen bubble which had formed in the reactor from the reaction of very hot water with the metals in the reactor core would ignite and explode. This, however, would be an ordinary chemical explosion, not an atomic explosion.
One of the big problems faced by the designers of the first atomic bombs was how to assemble a supercritical mass quickly enough to keep it from "fizzling" by starting to go off prematurely, which would have simply scattered the fissile material without ever amassing enough together for the really big explosion they were hoping for. The fuel in a reactor core is not "concentrated" enough for an atomic explosion to happen.
Because the fuel rods are held apart from each other, it is not possible to form a small critical mass as in a nuclear weapon, and apart from that the fuel is low enrichment, only 4 to 5 percent U-235, whereas a nuclear weapon needs nearly pure U-235. Chernobyl was a steam explosion, not a nuclear one, though of course the nuclear reactor provided the energy needed.
Because most power reactors use a moderator to slow neutrons to thermal energies, they cannot go prompt-critical, which is required for a bomb. The reaction rate of the chain reaction is about 1000 times too slow.
All the energy is slowly released in a controlled manner rather than all the energy released at once making a blast and an explosion.
The chain reaction is kept under control using neutron absorbers such as boron or cadmium arrestors.
Blah blah blah
fission
Uranium and Plutonium
Atom Bomb = Uranium H-Bomb = Hydrogen
if you bomb up a volcano it would wake up fast and explode it might go far shooting a crater but if you just throw a bomb it will just explode!
Uranium is extracted from mines and processed by chemical engineering techniques.
it made atomic bomb
The original ones were a ball of uranium with explosives all around it to press it into a critical mass so it would explode.
It was both: an atomic bomb using uranium as its fuel.
Hiroshima bomb: uranium Nagasaki bomb: plutonium
A uranium bomb is an atomic bomb fueled by uranium-235A plutonium bomb is an atomic bomb fueled by plutonium-239A composite bomb is an atomic bomb fueled by both uranium-235 and plutonium-239A wet bomb is a hydrogen bomb fueled by liquefied deuterium/tritiumA dry bomb is a hydrogen bomb fueled by solid lithium deuteride
A bomb containing highly enriched uranium (in the isotope 235U) as explosive.
when Soviets explode first atomic bomb
atomic
They explode, I believe
explode
I presume you meant 'explode' not 'explore'. Which bomb? Where? When?
Yes,well and truly it was.In fact,a uranium bomb is one of a rare bomb made.
They sat there and watched the bomb explode into pieces.