answersLogoWhite

0

Plaintiff vs defendant

Updated: 4/29/2024
User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 11y ago

Best Answer

Plaintiff is the person/legal entity who raises the complaint in a court of law while defendant is the person/legal entity against whom the complaint is raised in the court of law.

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

βˆ™ 1w ago

A plaintiff is the party who brings a civil lawsuit against another party, known as the defendant, seeking legal remedy or compensation for harm or breach of contract. The plaintiff is responsible for proving their case against the defendant in court.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Plaintiff vs defendant
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

Is the plaintiff or the defendant listed first in a lawsuit?

The plaintiff's name will be listed first on the summons followed by the term vs. 'whomever'. If the question refers to multiple parties being sued it really doesn't matter as long as all the debtors are named. For example, if it is a joint credit card account, both account holders have to be named as defendants in the suit. When the suit involves a primary borrower and a cosigner the debtors are usually sued in separate actions.


What are the case facts about r vs amkeyo 1917klr 14?

R v. Amkeyo 1917 KLR 14 is a case from Kenya that involves a criminal trial. The case facts typically found in the judgment would include details such as the charges brought against the defendant, the evidence presented by the prosecution, any defenses raised by the defendant, and the ultimate decision of the court. It is important to read the full judgment to understand the specific circumstances and legal principles involved in the case.


What was People vs Jennings about?

People v. Jennings was a legal case in California in which the defendant was convicted of murder for facilitating a robbery that resulted in a death. The case raised questions about the legal principle of aiding and abetting, as well as the extent of a defendant's responsibility in a crime they did not directly commit.


What are the grounds of cox vs hickman case?

The grounds of the Cox v. Hickman case were a dispute over ownership of shares in a business. Specifically, the case involved whether an agreement to transfer shares was legally binding and whether the defendant had breached that agreement. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, Cox, finding that the defendant, Hickman, had indeed breached the agreement.


What was the courth decision about soldano vs o'daniels?

In Soldano v. O'Daniels, the court ruled that there was no constitutional right to privacy for conversations conducted in public places, such as a jail visitation area. The court found that police recording these conversations did not violate the Fourth Amendment rights of the individuals involved.

Related questions

How did the plessy vs Ferguson case get its name?

From the plaintiff, Homer Plessy, and the defendant, John Howard Ferguson.


Civil trial vs criminal trial?

In a Criminal Trial, you have a Prosecutor and Defendant. The prosecutor's job is to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. In a Civil Trial, you have a Plaintiff and a Defendant. The plaintiff's jog is to present the preponderance of the evidence. Both can be jury trials. The bar is lower for the defendant in the Criminal trial. He can demand a jury trial and get it in most situations. Beyond a reasonable doubt means almost certain. Preponderance of evidence means the evidence on the side of the plaintiff is a whole lot stronger than that on the side of the defendant. Still, what a jury will decide and award one party is frequently simply a guess. It can differ quit a bit from theory.


How are case decided in court?

The 'name' of a case is called the STYLE of the case and it consists of the names of the parties involved (e.g.: Jones v. Smith, in a civil case or The state of ____ v. John BadGuy, in the case of a criminal case).


Is the plaintiff or the defendant listed first in a lawsuit?

The plaintiff's name will be listed first on the summons followed by the term vs. 'whomever'. If the question refers to multiple parties being sued it really doesn't matter as long as all the debtors are named. For example, if it is a joint credit card account, both account holders have to be named as defendants in the suit. When the suit involves a primary borrower and a cosigner the debtors are usually sued in separate actions.


Who was the defendant in tinker vs des miones?

DEs moines


What was the defendant's position in tinker vs des moines?

They supported the school official's.


Can the same attorney represent the victim and the defendant on a domestic violence case were it's the state vs defendant in Tennessee?

They most certainly cannot do so. It would be a conflict of interest.


Who is the defendant in the loving vs Virginia case?

The Plaintiff was Mildred Jeter (Black women) and Richard Perry Loving (white male). Both were arrested on July of 1958 for violating the terms of the Racial Integrity Act. Meaning it was unlawful for a white individual to marry an African American or any other race besides their own for that matter.


If you receive a summons without a case number or a court seal is it official or a 'scare tactic'?

An official court summons will always have a heading such as : "Circuit Court of the state of ______ County of_______ (or something similar). It will also have: The date, the case (docket) number, the court number and Plaintiff: _________ vs. Defendant: _______ Lots of "legalese" in between and at the end, the offical seal and signature of the clerk of the court.


What are the four criteria set by Barker vs Wingo?

1.) The length of the delay,2.) the reasons for it, 3.) whether the delay has in fact harmed the defendant and,4.)whether the defendant asked for a prompt trial.


What did the Supreme Court rule in the 1950 case Sweatt vs painter?

The district court decision on the Sweatt vs Painter case was to grant the plaintiff a writt of mandamus and continued the case for 6 months.


Who were the main people involved in plessy Vs Ferguson?

The main people involved in Plessy v. Ferguson were Homer Plessy, who was the plaintiff in the case and a man of mixed racial heritage, and Judge John H. Ferguson, who was the defendant in his capacity as a judge responsible for enforcing segregation laws in Louisiana. The lawyers who represented the parties before the Supreme Court were Albion TourgΓ©e for Plessy and Milton J. Cunningham for Ferguson.