The empirical rule can only be used for a normal distribution, so I will assume you are referring to a normal distribution. Chebyshev's theorem can be used for any distribution. The empirical rule is more accurate than Chebyshev's theorem for a normal distribution. For 2 standard deviations (sd) from the mean, the empirical rule says 95% of the data are within that, and Chebyshev's theorem says 1 - 1/2^2 = 1 - 1/4 = 3/4 or 75% of the data are within that. From the standard normal distribution chart, the answer for 2 sd from the mean is 95.44% So, as you can see the empirical rule is more accurate.
Yes, and the justification comes from the Central Limit Theorem.
The central limit theorem is one of two fundamental theories of probability. It's very important because its the reason a great number of statistical procedures work. The theorem states the distribution of an average has the tendency to be normal, even when it turns out that the distribution from which the average is calculated is definitely non-normal.
Price and quantity demanded are both interdependent: there is not an independent variable. From that point of view, there is no reason to put one variable on the x-axis rather than the other.However, putting price on the horizontal axis makes it simpler to add the supply curve on the same chart, and then study the market equilibrium.Price and quantity demanded are both interdependent: there is not an independent variable. From that point of view, there is no reason to put one variable on the x-axis rather than the other.However, putting price on the horizontal axis makes it simpler to add the supply curve on the same chart, and then study the market equilibrium.Price and quantity demanded are both interdependent: there is not an independent variable. From that point of view, there is no reason to put one variable on the x-axis rather than the other.However, putting price on the horizontal axis makes it simpler to add the supply curve on the same chart, and then study the market equilibrium.Price and quantity demanded are both interdependent: there is not an independent variable. From that point of view, there is no reason to put one variable on the x-axis rather than the other.However, putting price on the horizontal axis makes it simpler to add the supply curve on the same chart, and then study the market equilibrium.
If you have ever heard of a 3:4:5 triangle, there's your answer. 3 and 4 The reason this is so, is because 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2 (9 + 16 = 25) according to the Pythagorean Theorem, and 3 + 4 + 5 just so happens to equal 12.
The most important reason... The primary reason ...
According to biologists, the reason an empirical formula is not double that of the monosaccharide is because it loses one water molecule.
According to biologists, the reason an empirical formula is not double that of the monosaccharide is because it loses one water molecule.
theorem
Theorem
A superstition is any belief that is followed based on tradition and empirical evidence rather than a belief that is based on scientific testing, logic and reason: Any belief that relies on the existence of something supernatural for an explanation, it is a superstition.
A superstition is any belief that is followed based on tradition and empirical evidence rather than a belief that is based on scientific testing, logic and reason: Any belief that relies on the existence of something supernatural for an explanation, it is a superstition.
While the theorem is attributed to Pythagoras, there is reason to believe it was known much earlier. For example, megalithic sites that predate Pythagoras seem to have applied this knowledge.
The paragigm shift from mystical life to measurable life The dawn of the age of REASON Empirical evidence ONLY no more gnosis The paragigm shift from mystical life to measurable life The dawn of the age of REASON Empirical evidence ONLY no more gnosis
If your issues are on the table, then it would be apparent that empirical evidence would trump theory, if the theory on the table were not proven to be true. If the theory were proven to be true, and the empirical evidence does not agree with the theory, then more experimentation would be necessary to determine the validity of the theory.
Yes, and the justification comes from the Central Limit Theorem.
The central limit theorem is one of two fundamental theories of probability. It's very important because its the reason a great number of statistical procedures work. The theorem states the distribution of an average has the tendency to be normal, even when it turns out that the distribution from which the average is calculated is definitely non-normal.
Laurens P. Hickok has written: 'Empirical psychology' -- subject(s): Psychology 'Empirical Psychology' -- subject(s): Psychology 'The sources of military delusion, and the practicability of their removal' -- subject(s): Peace, Pacifism 'Intellectual development in its spontaneity and its liberty' 'The logic of reason, universal and eternal' -- subject(s): Reason, Logic 'Empirical psychology' -- subject(s): Psychology 'Humanity immortal' -- subject(s): Accessible book, Theological anthropology, Redemption 'Rational cosmology' -- subject(s): Cosmology