0
The anti-federalist james winthrop argued that a bill of rights was necessary in the constitution because?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
it would secure the minority against the usurpation and tyranny of the majority.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who was the leader of Boston settlement?
I believe the group of Puritans that settled Boston was led by John Winthrop.
Compare the arguments for and against the Constitution made by the Federalists and Antifederalists during the struggle over ratification?
The main agreements between the antifederalist and the federalist were about the bill of rights and the need for a government. The antifederalist demanded to have a bill of rights because it can explain the ideals described in the Declaration of Independence better than the Constitution because the bill of rights gives us freedom of press, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. Also, the federalist felt like it was important to have a government. They both disagreed. This is right luv
What ways did the anti federalists criticize the constitution?
The anti federalists criticized the constitution because they felt that it would give too much power to the federal government and take away the rights of the states and local government branches. The anti federalists argued that the constitution provided for a centralized form of government rather than a federal government form.
Why was john winthrop demanding?
John Winthrop was demanding because he thinks all the colonists should follow his rules and expcted the other colonists to look up to the group of Puritans that he led.
What was the purpose of john Winthrop's sermon?
The pilgrims because he still needed the land/gold.
Antifederalist opposed ratifying the constitution because they did not want to?
Anti-Federalists were opposed to ratifying the Constitution because they did not want to give the federal government that much power. The Constitution was eventually ratified on June 21, 1788.
Why did the antifederalist oppose the constitution?
They were afraid that too much power would be vested in a central government. Also, they opposed it because there was no Bill of Rights.
Why did the Antifederalist want a bill of rights to be added to the Constitution?
Mostly because they wanted more freedom, like freedom of speech and things like that.
Why did antifederalist believe that constitution was a threat to liberty?
They believed this because it had enumerated their rights, and they believed that any rights not stated in the constitution would not be given to them. Believing this, they did not want anything telling them would they could or could not do, so this is why they thought this was a threat to liberty.
Why did antifederalist believe the constitution was a threat to liberty?
They believed this because it had enumerated their rights, and they believed that any rights not stated in the constitution would not be given to them. Believing this, they did not want anything telling them would they could or could not do, so this is why they thought this was a threat to liberty.
Why is the preamble necessary in a constitution you the Philippines?
The preamble is not an essential part of the Constitution. Notice that it is not one of the Essential requisites of a Good written Constitution. But it is important because it serves to provide an orientation or explanation of the context of the constitution.
Who was the leader of Boston settlement?
I believe the group of Puritans that settled Boston was led by John Winthrop.
Did Jefferson argue with the necessary addition to the constitution and why?
Yes, Jefferson argued with the necessary addition to the constitution. This is because he felt he had to protect the people from the abuses of power and government.
Who was against the Constitution when it was written?
The Federalists supported the constitution and the antifederalist were against it.
Compare the arguments for and against the Constitution made by the Federalists and Antifederalists during the struggle over ratification?
The main agreements between the antifederalist and the federalist were about the bill of rights and the need for a government. The antifederalist demanded to have a bill of rights because it can explain the ideals described in the Declaration of Independence better than the Constitution because the bill of rights gives us freedom of press, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. Also, the federalist felt like it was important to have a government. They both disagreed. This is right luv
Why was it necessary to establish flexibility in the constitution?
because it was the constitution's way to keep pace by a process called the amendment-adding to or changing the text of the constitution....( i dont knoe if its right.i tried my best)
Why has it been necessary to make changes in the constitution by methods in addition to formal amendment-?
Because the need to "repeal" amendments was sometimes necessary and desired by the people, as in the 18th amendment.
