answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Miranda v. Arizona

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Miranda vs. Arizona. Hence Miranda rights

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: The case that established rights that are read at the time of the arrest was vs Arizona?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Which US Supreme Court case established the rights that are read everytime at the time of an arrest is?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda vs. Arizona


What gaurantees that a person will be informed of there rights when placed under arrest?

The supreme court case Miranda vs Arizona.


Which case is correctly matched with the principle it established?

Miranda v. Arizona-suspected criminals must be read their rights


Whose court case established that accused criminals must be informed of their rights?

Miranda v. Arizona, (1966).


Informing suspects of their legal rights during an arrest procedure is required as a result of?

The U.S. Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona is the basis for the procedure of informing suspects of their legal rights during arrest. As a matter of fact, the reading of these rights is commonly called the Miranda Warning.


Which Supreme Court case established to that accused must be read their rights?

Miranda v. Arizona


The case of established that an accused person must be advised of hisher rights prior to talking to a law enforcement officer?

Miranda v Arizona


What landmark Supreme Court case established the right of the accused to know their rights?

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Miranda v. Arizona, (1966) was the landmark Supreme Court case in which the court declared that the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, (which also applies to the states through application of the Fourteenth Amendment) required that before law enforcement officers attempt to interrogate the accused, they inform the accused of their rights. These rights are now referred to as Miranda rights.


An accused person has the right to an?

They have(if in the Us) all the rights in the United States Constitution. But when someone is under arrest the arresting officer must read the person their Miranda Rights. Miranda rights are what you here on all those TV shows..."you have the right to remain silent, anything you say or do can be used against you in the court of law. You have the right to AN ATTORNEY. if you cannot afford an attorney one will be given to you" etc. This was established by Miranda v. Arizona case. and the right to counsel(an attorney) was established by the case; Gideon v. Wainwright.


What case established the reading of a person's rights?

Miranda v.Arizona


Which case set the precedent that verbal warnings must be given to a suspect during arrest?

Miranda v Arizona was the case that set the precedent that verbal warnings must be given to a suspect during arrest.


Who brought a case to the Supreme Court based on his arrest?

There could be several answers to this question because the Warren Court heard quite a few cases involving suspects' or defendants' rights at different phases of the pre-arrest and arrest process. My hunch is you may be asking about Ernesto Miranda, petitioner of Miranda v. Arizona, (1966), who confessed to police without knowing his constitutional rights protecting against self incrimination and the availability of counsel. The decision in this case resulted in law enforcement personnel being required to read a person his or her rights before being detained. These are known as Miranda Rights.Case Citation:Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966)