help from a neighboring Native American tribe.
It was taxation without representation through parliament it was about taxation without representation through parliament
There's no way to answer the question without knowing whether it refers to the Plymouth in New Brunswick, California, Connecticut, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Massachusetts, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, Nebraska, New York, New Hampshire, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Utah, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, or perhaps even the one in England.
Early in the 17th century, a colony was founded at Plymouth (in the area of modern-day Massachusetts) by religious settlers from England. These colonists were primarily seeking to practice their religion without interference or persecution from the religious authorities in England.
The establishment of a standing army in Boston The disbanding of the Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York assemblies Parliament taking away colonists property without their consent, mainly through taxes
it meant the colonist would not pay taxes without voting for the goverment/parilament
"No taxation without representation."
The Stamp act was unfair to the colonist because the colonist were being taxed by Parliament without any saying in the taxation. Ergo, "No taxation without Representation!" the colonist just wanted to be represented. Also because it was the Britishs' fault for being in debt because of the french and Indian war. not the colonists'
Jamestown
Because they were taxed without representation which means no colonist representatives were present when Parliament decided to tax the colonies.
"taxation without representation " the colonist where mad because they didn't have a say in what to do in parliament they just chose for them.
Taxation without representation
Taxation without representation