Answer this question…
check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.
evaluating the degree to which bias affects its conclusions (Apex)
jhvhvghjvbnv
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Answer this question… Different pieces of evidence may contradict the original information.
Corroborated sources of historical evidence. (APEX) !/
i think, they will study what we did in life
Historians look for evidence about the distant past in myths and legends because myths and legends tell what people believed and understood. Historians study by looking at journals, data, diaries etc., to learn information.
Search for additional evidence to see which argument it supports.
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
Basing historical accounts on reliable evidence
Historical evidence.
Comparing and contrasting historical sources
evaluate the evidence used to support it
The steps historians take include studying the lives of ppl in different times and places is the work of the historians. The most basic tool for this work is historical evidence. Historians collect the evidence, then use it to interpret events. Historians look first at a primary source, first hand information about ppl or events or a secondary source that is stated after the fact.
To find answers to questions about the past using evidence
To find answers to questions about the past using evidence.
Check to see that it is supported by historical evidence.
I have the feeling that your question may be part of a series of questions that were put to you. So there is a risk in giving an answer out of the context of your homework assignment. But generally speaking, the strongest argument in any historical debate will be the one where facts and assumed motives can be supported by contemporary factual and documentary evidence; the more, the better.
Maybe. Historians have traced him back to 1226 to when oral stories were told in rhyme, but there is no true historical evidence he really existed.