Yes Australia was needed. The ill-advised assault on Gallipoli ended in defeat, thus achieving none of its objectives. In fact, it strengthened the position of the Germans by bring Turkey into the war on the German side. Without the joint Australia and New Zealand Army Corps (ANZAC) the allied defeat at Gallipoli would have occurred sooner. To that extent, Australia was needed. But the decision to attack Turkey was ill-advised, and the attack poorly planned and, in some ways, poorly executed.
the importance and consequences of gallipoli war
The battle in Gallipoli, during World War 1, lasted for 9 months. Although the battle ended in 120,000 casualties it held no significance to the war itself.
to help to take over gallipoli and then to defend it also gallipoli is in turkey
Gallipoli
Several battles in 1915 - All on the Gallipoli peninsular. (Referred to as the Gallipoli Campaign.)
They went to egypt.
Gallipoli.
umm...Gallipoli
Why world war 1 start this war started when Australia decided to take over Gallipoli
Gallipoli, in Turkey, Eastern Mediterranean.
it hurt them
They went from Australia to Egypt to Gallipoli it would take to 4-5 days
The Gallipoli landing occurred soon after the onset of World War I.
It wasn't necessarily the world that attacked Gallipoli, mainly Britain, Russia and Australia. This was because Russia wanted control over Gallipoli so that the war against Britain would be easier.
the importance and consequences of gallipoli war
ANZAC was a phrase used to describe units from Australia and new Zealand, it originated in World War one, specifically during the Gallipoli campaign.
ANZAC Day commemorates the landing of the Australian and New Zealand Army Corps troops at Gallipoli in World War I.