answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

a fungus grew on a certain type of potato and since all of irelands potatoes were the same kind, their main food source (potatoes) became inedible and a famine came and most of the Ireland population moved to the americas.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Yes, but it was not independent, as it was ruled by Britain as part of the United Kingdom.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

people were mostly poor

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was Ireland like in the late 1800s and early 1900s?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp