Most attacks that fail could have succeeded had circumstances been slightly different. Similarly, most successful attacks could have failed. Any failed attack becomes, by definition, a tactical error. Those are the fortunes of war. Lee's decision to fight at Gettysburg after the first day was an error because the possibilities of success on that ground were too few. Had he shifted to the right, seeking better ground he might possibly have gained a victory. Certainly the odds might have been more in his favor. Anyway it didn't matter. Nothing that happened in Pennsylvania was going to stop Grant from taking Vicksburg on July 4 and that was by far the more strategically important event.Michael Montagne
While its true that Grant's capture of Vicksburg was important, the Battle of Gettysburg is still the high water mark of the Confederacy. When Lee ordered Pickett's charge, he made a colossal blunder. Of course, this judgment is made with the benefit of hindsight. However, I have been to Gettysburg and I have stood and looked out across the ground that the Southerners had to cross that day. Secondly, I also point to Lee's experiences in the Battle of Malvern Hill. At Malvern Hill, Lee faced a situation where he tried to dislodge a Federal force with the use of artillery. That attempt failed miserably, and it would fail again at Gettysburg. The Civil War was not a war of 'attack' since the Napoleonic charge was no longer effective (rifled muskets had much better range). So, when Stonewall Jackson utters 'we must show them the bayonet' - he also shows that he's fighting a different war from a different era. Lee's subordinate, Longstreet was in favor of the 'offensive defensive' - ie. to lure the Federals to attack the Confederates on 'Southern' terms. Throughout the course of the war, thousands died because generals just didn't understand that you could not run men with bayonets and one musket shot into an enemy protected by breast works and cannon.
Stop ordering me around.We are ordering a Chinese takeaway tonight.
The definition of ordering system is the program or method in which the ordering process is carried out. Examples of an ordering system are MRP, DRP and fixed reorder point.
the job ordering goods
Getting something on the internet. (ordering online)
partial ordering is the order which full fills the requierments reflexivity ,anti-symmetricity and transtivity
yes transportation an ordering cost
eoq =economic ordering cost is constant
In considering the phases of matter, what is meant by ordering ?
It will be easier to know what to write
Ordering by mail, over the phone, or in person. - John Anav
That 'correct ordering' is usually called 'spelling'.
changing of unsorted list to sorted list in a ordering from alphabets, numbers, ASC/DESC.
When ordering checks on be careful and first check out the company you are ordering online from is reputable. Make sure that the site you are ordering from is secure as you will be giving out checking account number, routing number and also credit card information to complete your order. If you follow these precaution before ordering then your transaction online shoul be a pleasant one.
For example, if your ordering pair was (7,9) you would go 7 to the right, and to mark up 9, go from 7 up to 9 units and that'll be your ordering pair.
data flow diagram for resturant ordering system
A pint is smaller - whther you are ordering chinee food or not is irrelevant.
when your buying or ordering thing for example ordering a clothes from catalogue
The difference between ordering and buying is In ordering you obtains the delivery service from the shop to your destination and in case of Buying you don't use delivery services offered by the company.
There is no direct ordering Guide from Cisco. The closest thing is the data sheet.
In the book, To Kill a Mockingbird, Calpurnia was always ordering Scout out of the kitchen.
Ordering cost is the cost to get it here. Carrying cost is the cost to keep it here.
subtract the avarage from getting your food and use the avarage of ordering your food.