No, the large majority of people on both sides are Muslim. It is thus odd that the Muslim world seems completely uninterested.
The similarities between the Rwandan genocide and Darfur are that rebel's attack government and the government's reply is to purposely kill not only the rebels but the civilians. The World hasn't and didn't do anything really to stop it. Hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, and many more removed from their homes. Both acts were some what supported by the government.
It really did not have a huge affect on the world. The UN came to help but that was it. Their were the UNAMIR efforts to help. The genocide in Rwanda was left in Rwanda and neither the U.S or Europe clamed to help.
No one really won it the rebels attacked the government and the government retaliated by killing thousands of its own people. The country now has millions of people homeless and starving and there is famine and a water shortage
Henry Hudson didn't really have a religion, but a Dutch minister named Peter Pantrius influenced him on his third and fourth voyages.
to give thanks and celebrate their religion
The Darfur genocide never ended buddy. Simply type in "When did the Darfur genocide end" into Google, and you find a list of charities to donate to. You see those, but no date. why? because it never ended. Although the genocide had died down slightly over time, it is still going on today. the death toll has been estimated in the millions. It makes you really realize how lucky you are, doesn't it?
From everything I can understand - the Muslim Arab Sudanese of the North are trying to rid Sudan of (or take-over and convert by force) all the Southern African Sudanese - many of whom are Christian (Catholic and other) or animist.
The similarities between the Rwandan genocide and Darfur are that rebel's attack government and the government's reply is to purposely kill not only the rebels but the civilians. The World hasn't and didn't do anything really to stop it. Hundreds of thousands of people have been killed, and many more removed from their homes. Both acts were some what supported by the government.
the Rwanda genocide never really did end the tutsi were driven out and went in to sleeper cells
There isn't really any difference, the Holocaust just refers to the genocide of the Jews during WW2, so the Holocaust was a genocide, it just refers to a specific one.
United States, China (not really sending weapons) Libya and chad
The Rwandan genocide was not really a war, since the aim of this genocide and any genocide is to exterminate a certain group of people. In the Rwandan genocide the aim was to kill all the Tutsis. Fortunately not all the Tutsis were killed in this genocide, but hundreds of thousands were and Rwanda still has to bear the scar of what happened during that horrible time to this day, so nobody won the genocide, everybody just lost.
Hinduism is really a religion, yes.....any belief system in a superpower/deity is considered a religion
he doesn't really have a religion. and i don't think a lot of people really know.
Genocide really demoralizes a society. In most cases a whole generation is usually cut off. The people who suffer more are usually children and women.
No, not really. The only 'religion' they have is greek!
It really did not have a huge affect on the world. The UN came to help but that was it. Their were the UNAMIR efforts to help. The genocide in Rwanda was left in Rwanda and neither the U.S or Europe clamed to help.