No, bombings in WW1 were not as bad as WW2 because of the use of bomber aircraft, which at anytime could fly to London. Also, the Germans were not as technologically advanced enough to travel from France to England with an army and invade. Search on Google images and you can see the damage caused by the Germans in WW2, compared to WW1 and you can see the difference.
Much worse than they did prior to WWII.
Germany wanted an empire like Britain and France had. Unfortunately, Britain and France owned over half of the world between them and Britain also had the world's best navy, so Germany would have to both increase the size of its navy and fight Britain and France for colonial possessions. This damaged relations
having alliances involved more nations in world war I Germany got in because it was an ally of Bulgaria. France and Britain got in because they were both allies with sebiria
Honestly, by whom? There are some reasons that WW1 couldbe considered "worse", but you need to be specific about your measuring stick - that is, what do you mean by "worse"?
no it was not they made this world a worse place
Much worse than they did prior to WWII.
Have you read ANY history ? - Britain and the Allies won the war - or else you would be living under Nazi slavery, or worse, in a concentration camp.
Germany wanted an empire like Britain and France had. Unfortunately, Britain and France owned over half of the world between them and Britain also had the world's best navy, so Germany would have to both increase the size of its navy and fight Britain and France for colonial possessions. This damaged relations
Relations between Britain and Germany grew worse from 1900-1904 because at the time both were trying to colonize countries in Africa. Britain were building up their navy and Germany viewed this as a threat so they did the same.
it can pollute water, air, the the environment worse and worse.
having alliances involved more nations in world war I Germany got in because it was an ally of Bulgaria. France and Britain got in because they were both allies with sebiria
Sadly it is getting worse in the whole world.
no
The world would be worse because we would not have good music to listen to
Honestly, by whom? There are some reasons that WW1 couldbe considered "worse", but you need to be specific about your measuring stick - that is, what do you mean by "worse"?
In General WW2 was worse in amount of casaulties, areas of fighting, technology advancements but I'm sure there are some areas where WW1 was worse that WW2.
12 months a year, but the shedding is worse in the summer months.