0
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a Dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
At times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoYes, you could describe them as temporary executives.
Yes, you could describe them as temporary executives.
Yes, you could describe them as temporary executives.
Yes, you could describe them as temporary executives.
Yes, you could describe them as temporary executives.
Yes, you could describe them as temporary executives.
Yes, you could describe them as temporary executives.
Yes, you could describe them as temporary executives.
Yes, you could describe them as temporary executives.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoYes, you could describe them as temporary executives.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoAt times, yes, the republic was in need of a dictatorship. When the senate and the consuls could not agree upon a course of action to solve a crisis, a dictator was the best solution.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who are th government officials of roman republic?
The government officials of the Roman republic are starting from the top: Consul--top man, two of them Praetor--mainly a judge, but had other duties as well. Number changed over time Quaestor--treasury offiial, number changed over time Aedile--in charge of public works. Number changed over time. Censor--oversaw the rolls of citizenship every five years. Could remove people from the senate, if deemed unworthy. Tribune--plebeian official who had power of veto over everyone except a dictator. Originally two, but grew to ten.
Does Poland have dictatorship?
No, Poland is a parliamentary republic.
Did the Romans revolt against dictatorship?
No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.
How is dictatorship similar to republic governments?
A republic is a country which is not rules by a king (monarchy) prince (principality) or duke (duchy). It can be a democracy, an authoritarian state, a totalitarian state or a dictatorship.
Why was Hitler the alternative to Weimar republic?
The Third Reich which was a dictatorship whereas the Weimar Republic was a democracy.
How republic was a roman republic?
The Roman Republic was a republic fully because it was not ruled by a king or other aristocrats. This is the definition of a republic. That is all you need to be a republic. A republic can be a democracy, an oligarchy or a dictatorship, so long as it is not ruled by a king or other aristocrats.
How were the political systems of the Roman empire and the Roman republic different?
the Empire was virtually a Dictatorship and the republic was a democracy
The roman republic provided a model for the US government in what way does the US government differ from the roman republic?
Temporary dictatorship
Is the Dominican Republic a dictatorship or oligarchy?
It is a Unitary presidential republic.
Who are th government officials of roman republic?
The government officials of the Roman republic are starting from the top: Consul--top man, two of them Praetor--mainly a judge, but had other duties as well. Number changed over time Quaestor--treasury offiial, number changed over time Aedile--in charge of public works. Number changed over time. Censor--oversaw the rolls of citizenship every five years. Could remove people from the senate, if deemed unworthy. Tribune--plebeian official who had power of veto over everyone except a dictator. Originally two, but grew to ten.
Which form of government would the plebeian be more likely to support A Roman republic or a dictatorship under Julius Caesar Why?
They no longer had wanted a republic, They Had A Dictatorship....Senators wanted so much power and influence in the Empire. The emperor had all the political power and also the army was completely loyal with him....
Is the Republic of Guinea a democracy monarchy or a dictatorship?
You could call it a Dictatorship as it is ruled by the military.
Is there a dictatorship or republic in Cuba?
It is a communist country.
Does Poland have dictatorship?
No, Poland is a parliamentary republic.
Did the Romans revolt against dictatorship?
No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.No, they revolted against the monarchy. A dictatorship in the Roman world was not the same as what we consider a dictatorship today. In the Roman government a dictator was a legally appointed magistrate with a limited term of office which could be renewed if necessary.
How is dictatorship similar to republic governments?
A republic is a country which is not rules by a king (monarchy) prince (principality) or duke (duchy). It can be a democracy, an authoritarian state, a totalitarian state or a dictatorship.
Why was Hitler the alternative to Weimar republic?
The Third Reich which was a dictatorship whereas the Weimar Republic was a democracy.
