English to Hebrew
Knights
Knights Templar

Were knights as good as they were portrayed?

747576

Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered
2010-01-10 18:02:28
2010-01-10 18:02:28
AnswerThe glamourisation of knighthood has been a steady progressive trend since the first 'tales of King Arthur', and the recognition of this fact has led many to believe the 'lashback' that there were -no- virtuous knights, and that there was no Cult of Courtly Love or Cult of Chivalry. In simple answer, knights were people, and as with people today, there are those who were the paragon of good behaviour, and those who were the worst examples of excess and cruelty.

However, if one reads texts outlining the concept of chivalry, from the period in question, it is clear that knights were -supposed- to behave in a virtuous manner, and as such, those poor examples of humanity were also poor examples of knights.

001
๐ŸŽƒ
0
๐Ÿคจ
0
๐Ÿ˜ฎ
0
๐Ÿ˜‚
0
User Avatar

Related Questions


Back in the Middle Ages, it was thought that the knights represented society. Therefore, the people wanted the knights to have a good reputation.


so the knights servant can protect him from an enemy


Griffins can be portrayed as both good and bad.


Heath Ledger portrayed Sir William Thatcher/Sir Ulrich von Lichtenstein of Gelderland in the 2001 movie.


King Arthur is portrayed as the ideal King because of his ideals and morals. He was supposedly fair, honourable, brave, loyal, religious and he was also supposedly the originator of democratic leadership (his knights of the round table) as well as fighting off the darkness (Mordred and Morgana). He also founded Camelot which was supposed to be fair and sort of utopian kingdom and so is portrayed as a good leader and king to his subjects. The legend of King Arthur, however, is based on fables.


Cal Knights Baseball has good coaching, but is very disorganized and seems to care more about getting your money then putting together a competitive team.


1. People got protection from knights 2. Lords got protection from knights in exchange for money 3. Knights got money from lords in exchange for protection


The chivalry did so good at training the knights.


The Catholic Encyclopedia has a good article on the Knights Templars. The link is below this answer, under "related links."


they were not portrayed as a good image in the book or the movie


Not according to the Barron's legal dictionary as portrayed here: http://www.answers.com/topic/good-samaritan


because they wanted to be as good as their husbands


the knights were always soo good at building and the nobles used their building skills to kill them and take their slaves


he may look good at first but he is actually bad


There was a need for the Church to find a way to tolerate knights in good conscience and for the knights to pursue their livelihood in "spiritual comfort." Such a code would put a knight in the service of the Church.


as fearsome, scaled beasts, some times evil and sometimes good.


men are portrayed as strong, cruel and horrible and women and portrayed as weak and useless


the opposite. liu kang is portrayed as a good guy to us because we know the truth but to the people of world he is portrayed as a bad guy because shang tsung is killing all of people and liu kang won't step forward. I Think He's Good. Liu Kang can't step forward it would ruin everything.


They had to be noble and well mannered. They also had to be good at horsemanship and swordsmanship.


KOTF.com thats the only good download


fighting in tourniments was good training for combat


portrayed e.g this person is portrayed in this way........


God is portrayed in the bible as a spirit.


their basically portrayed as terrorists


articles of how marriage is portrayed in our media?



Copyright ยฉ 2020 Multiply Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.