Dragon artifacts would be a lot less expensive than what they are now. This is assuming that there are no dragons, which we can't prove for certain anyway. there would be a good chance that there would be a lot less humans and wildlife due to how much somthing that big would eat. and if they give birth like reptiles then we would be in a very bad shape
Most likely on mountains because there is only a small amount of the humas that live on mountains.
No, sadly dragons are not real. (Only in fictional stories, they are real.)
There are no real dragons in Dublin.There are no real dragons in Dublin.There are no real dragons in Dublin.There are no real dragons in Dublin.There are no real dragons in Dublin.There are no real dragons in Dublin.There are no real dragons in Dublin.There are no real dragons in Dublin.There are no real dragons in Dublin.There are no real dragons in Dublin.There are no real dragons in Dublin.
Dragons are real and were real so they would have 1,932 chromosomes.
Yes, dead ones though. Real dragons live in dragon's circle. If you go, trust me, you may not make it out.
Dragons are not real. If they did exist they would be multicellular.
dragons could if they were real but mostly its the bones not the real dragons
dragons are not real
No. There are not such things as "real dragons."
Dragons are not real. If they did exist they would certainly be multicellular.
No, there are no real dragons in Poland.
Yes, and to prove it type in prehistoric dragons on google.
Dragons (that can fly and breath fire) are not real and have never existed.