Your question could raise a lot of controversy, but here is one answer. What people gain by having a absolute ruler depends solely upon the character of the ruler. Some could be benign, others tyrants. Generally there is peace and even some prosperity under a sole ruler. In today's world, we tend to think that the ideal form of government is some type of democracy. However it has been proven several times over that certain countries simply are not ready for the democratic process and in order to stop civil unrest, they need a "strongman".
They can gain security to be free. They would have no limitations. There wouldn't be major changes in leadership.
Absolute rule could produce stability. However, the amount of freedom depended on the ability of social groups to counterbalance the power of the absolute rulers. Such rulers saw the sate as their possessions (Louis XIV famously said l' etat c'est moi - I am the state), ruled arbitrarily and used their kingdoms as bases for the power and wealth and to flaunt this as Louis XIV's limitless extravagance clearly showed- so did Henry VIII. Absolute rulers also often dragged their kingdoms into war with other kingdoms to increase their own possessions. They got rid of dissenters by inventing charges of treason and by staging trials that were farcical as their task was to carry out the will of the king. What Henry VIII did to his wives is not exactly an example of security and freedom.
What happened with absolutism was the rise of the central state. Prior to this kings had to struggle against the challenge to their authority by rebel aristocrats and sometimes were not in control of the whole of their kingdoms. With absolutism kings managed to brake the power of the aristocrats, and assert their power absolutely. Their state became the central state able to control the kingdom.
It had very little to do with whether the people could gain from it. The people did not count, what matter was power.
How about this? Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
The leader could make quick decisions and not have to be potentially held-down by the legislative process, for example.
Medieval villages were settlements big enough to support a church. The population of such a place might typically have been around 200 to 500 people. A village would often have a baker, a miller (who might also have been the baker), a blacksmith, and other people engaged in crafts, but would not have a market, because having a permanent market required a charter, which would make the village into a town.
An East Indian Servant(: apex cheatin people!
Women in the royal households had washer women of their own, but they were not ordinary washer women. They had to be trusted to keep such questions as whether the queen might be pregnant to themselves.
I'm sure that the citizens of Rome were relatively happy, but the slaves that might be slain without cause could not have been very happy.
One reason the Romans didn't like what Jesus said was because he gained the interest of the Jewish people. The Romans were afraid that Jesus would lead a revolution against the Romans to give power back to the Jewish people.
Kids, like all people, are scared of having surgery. This is because it is a new experience, and they might be afraid that it will hurt or that they might die.
If leader makes bad decision, his/her power is severely weakened. if a group of people talk out against the ruler, that weakens their power. if surrounding countries have a government other than absolute power, the rulers absolute power is weakened.
It could be due to your body language and the expressions on your face.
Absolute disadvantage means a disadvantage that is completely working against any possible advantages something might have. Absolute Disadvantage is a deal breaker.
chaos
chaos
If you mean infinite brightness, then nothing.
Three reason a business mighty uses absolute reference in it calculation?
The answer to your travel question is 47?40 degrees north and 117?26 degrees west. This might of help you so thank wiki answers for letting people answer other people's questions.:):):):)
By having faith; the property of accepting as gospel that for which you possess no proof. "Why" might be a better question.
No. No it doesn't. Actually, it might to some people...
It will be more fair to people and it will be easier for people to get there. --------------- It is better protected from attack by invaders.