I think that slaves mostly did the work,yes they did break tools but this is not how they resisted slavery:)
Charles Pinckney was for slavery. As a plantation owner in the South he was highly dependent on slaves, he owned 52 himself. Also his state, South Carolina, was dependent on the work of slaves for the economy.
For the slaves that were born into slavery, they thought that was just how life went. But that doesn't mean they didn't want to be free.
to justify having slaves
the slaves felt GREAT when hearing about their fredom in slavery
No. He was a Quaker and they didn't believe in slavery.
when the slaves broke free
the Portuguese view of slavery are different from Africa because to Portuguese, they treated slaves as animals, slaves didn't have human rights, they weren't being treated as human beings. but on the other hand, the africa view slaves just like other people, the difference is that slaves could be very rich and powerful, but they will never have freedom.
. He argued against importation of slaves and motion the word 'slavery' be withheld from the constitution
they thought that they should have slaves so the job can get done
He ate toast and his slaves. He loved them very much!
The North had thought it was wrong to own slaves.
he had slaves but he treated them nicely until the Quakers said that slavery was bad, and then since john was a quaker he freed all his slaves. so he did not like it.
The majority of the population accepted slavery without reservation.
No. Your question smacks of the Jim Crow view of slavery and that was slaves were happy to be slaves. That is not true. When another person owns a person as property that is wrong.
Charles Pinckney was for slavery. As a plantation owner in the South he was highly dependent on slaves, he owned 52 himself. Also his state, South Carolina, was dependent on the work of slaves for the economy.
He own a plantation and was from Virginia. He owned slaves. For him, the issue was States rights for the ability to own slaves and Virginia was confederate so he went with his state.
Not that I have ever read. He had the school for navigation and was more interested in maps than slaves.