(1) singularity - it tests only one variable in the situation (2) reproducibility - it can be re-done by other scientists to verify the results (3) utility - the answer matters to human life in some way While most would agree with the first two elements of a "good experiment" listed above, I'm not sure you would find much consensus on the concept of "utility." Whether the result of an experiment is ultimately deemed "useful" to human life has little bearing on the methodology and scientific rigor with which an experiment is conducted. On the other hand, some would say that scientific integrity ("honesty") is a necessary ingredient in any good experiment, while others would say that a good experiment must either prove or disprove a hypothesis...which is, after all, the whole point of conducting the experiment in the first place.
The dependent variable, the independent variable, and the control group.
Dependent Variable: This is the factor, or property that you measure for, or the result. It could be different between the groups, or it could be the same. You don't know the value of this variable until
the end of the experiment. This is the EFFECT property mentioned in the hypothesis. example: how high the plant grows
Independent Variable: This is the factor, or variable that you change. This is the physical property that you have direct control over to change. It should be the ONLY difference between the two groups for it to be a good experiment. It is the CAUSE property mentioned in the hypothesis. example: the amount of light.
Control Group: The group that is used as the basis for comparison. It could be: the BEFORE part of a before and after experiment (mixing two chemicals to see a color change, the control group is the setup before they were mixed). It could be: the "normal" , or it should be the group in which the value of the independent variable is zero.
example: a plant set in a room with no light bulb.
Two essential characteristics of a scientific experiment:
1) Intellectual honesty (it also includes giving credit to those whose works we rely upon).
2) Strictly complying with Scientific Methodology -- includes spelling out the 'assumptions' and 'limitations' in interpreting/ applying the results of our experiment, especially in the Social Sciences.
variable, control group, hypothese etc. blah blah blah
A hypothesis, a control in the experiment, a variable, and analyzing the results of your experiment, and, of course, a conclusion.
the thing that they did
The scientific method that should be done throughout an experiment is to state the problem.
The scientific theory should be changed.
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
ONE :)
observe and record data.
The scientific method that should be done throughout an experiment is to state the problem.
Experiment
The scientific theory should be changed.
Analyze the experiment to decide whether the results were flawed.
ONE :)
You should include answer to your problem, 1 variable, and a control group.
The monitor and several components inside the cpu. they should be properly disposed of.
The scientific method does not detail how you do an experiment, only the method used in general terms.
With a [final] "Conclusion" (end result of research, an experiment. etc.)
A scientists should form a hypothesis, then conduct an experiment.
observe and record data.
The results go against the thinking of society.