answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Here are opinions on "Why shouldn't doctors be sued for a patient's death?": * Because they did more to keep them alive than anyone else? * Death happens to everyone. Bad things happen to good people. There is a very large difference between a bad outcome such as death and death caused by a mistake. People often sue physicians because something bad happened to them or a family member died that was not the result of anything the physician did or didn't do. If the physician did not meet the accepted standard of care and a death occurred because of it, there would be a reason to sue. But suing because a person who smoked for 30 years and had high blood pressure died of a heart attack is ridiculous, for example. * Unless there is clear evidence of negligence on the part of the attending physician or medical personnel there would be no grounds for remand and cure. Unfortunately there are unethical attorneys who take advantage of a family when they are the most vulnerable and convince them to pursue a malpractice suit regardless that said action has no merit. This however does not mean a doctor, hospital or any medical personnel or facility cannot nor should not be held legally accountable for harm done due to negligence.

User Avatar

Wiki User

โˆ™ 2006-01-05 17:53:57
This answer is:
User Avatar
Study guides

What factors contributed to the Holocaust

What was the result of the Scopes monkey trial

How did American women win the fight for suffrage

How did Fordism affect American labor

โžก๏ธ
See all cards
โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…โ˜†โ˜…
No Reviews

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are arguments for or against doctors being sued for a patient's death?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Who knows which patients are being given the placebo?

Both patients and doctors do not know


What are health concerns for a pediatrician?

Pediatricians are doctors who specialize in treating children. They have the same health concerns as other doctors such as possibly catching something from patients, and being doctors, they also risk being carriers of communicable diseases. So they have to take care of themselves for their own sake and that of their patients.


What are arguments for and against the atomic bombing of Japan being justified?

Most of the arguments were of the civilian deaths and the sickness those bombs brought.


Many patients do not like being seen by VA doctors, Do you know why that is?

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4351276/


Why did doctors tell patients to wear masks and costumes during Black Death times?

black death was thought to be airborne. So doctors were being precautions.


How does communication affect patient well being?

Patient and doctor communication is very important to a patients well being. Patients must tell doctors everything that may factor into treatment. If something is left out if could lead to more problems or improper treatment.


What are some arguments against Wegener's theory?

The man was hypocrite, he had no reason being in the busniness, and everyone was jealous of his super hot wife.


How is science used in being a doctor?

Doctors use science to predict how patients will respond to medications. It is also used in the development of new diagnostic equipment.


What is is an easy safe way to render someone unconscious?

There is no safe way to do that. Specialist doctors try to do that in hospitals, but some patients die, not because of the operation, but because of being rendered unconscious.


What are the arguments against the bomb being dropped on Hiroshima?

President Truman stated that he needed to end the war and to collapse Japan's means to make war ever again.


What do you have to do being a doctor?

treat patients.


What are the arguments for and against poverty in sub saharan Africa?

Arguments are that people should give more and not be selfish btu u can choose because u hav rights but people wuth lots of money should share it around instead of being snobby

People also asked