Rutherford explained that all the positive charge was concentrated at the centre and the electrons revolved around it.
But this theory was discarded as a charged particle undergoing circular motion would
accelerate and an accelerating particle looses energy. Hence, the electron would fall into the nucleus and the atom will collapse.
But this doesn't happen. So, Rutherford's model of atom was discarded.
Inability of stability of nucleas.
Inability of the explain line spectra of element.
Inability of describe the distribution of elactron and electron energies.
Rutherford explained that all the positive charge was concentrated at the centre and the electrons revolved around it.
But this theory was discarded as a charged particle undergoing circular motion would
accelerate and an accelerating particle looses energy. Hence, the electron would fall into the nucleus and the atom will collapse.
But this doesn't happen. So, Rutherford's model of atom was discarded.
Rutherford explained that all the positive charge was concentrated at the centre and the electrons revolved around it.
But this theory was discarded as a charged particle undergoing circular motion would
accelerate and an accelerating particle looses energy. Hence, the electron would fall into the nucleus and the atom will collapse.
But this doesn't happen. So, Rutherford's model of atom was discarded.
Rutherford's model of atom stated that all the positive charge was concentrated in the center together and electrons revolved around it but the classical theory of physics states that "If a charged particle undergoes circular motion, then it is subjected to accelerate and
an accelerating particle would loose energy".
Thus, the electrons revolving around the nucleus would go in a spiral path and ultimately
fall into the nucleus as there path will continue to shrink and the atom will collapse. But this does not happen.
So, Rutherford's model of atom was discarded.
Shortly: a positive nucleus float in a sea of negative electrical charges.
ac
was wandering the smae thing but i think they just developed rutherfords theory by doing the gold foil experiment in depth
That atoms have a positively charged nucleus.
Bohr's contribution to chemistry and physics regarding atoms was a theory on the atomic structure refining rutherfords model. Atoms were already shown to exist by others. Dalton is perhaps the most influential of the early pioneers.
john dalton develop an atomic theory in 1803, based on idea of the atomic exsiting
very small relative to size of whole atomextremely densehighly positively charged
According to Thomson's atomic theory, the mass of an atom was special evenly throughout its volume. Errest Rutherford's experiment proved this wrong.
he found faults in the atomic theory of jj Thompson
Because Joel is the man
no
was wandering the smae thing but i think they just developed rutherfords theory by doing the gold foil experiment in depth
the idea behind rutherfords atomic theory is that the atom has a central positive nucleus and negatively charged electrons, which move in orbits, surround it. most of the atom is made up of empty space. he assumed this theory through a gold-foil experiment about which you can find information on the internet.
yes it was tested by the gold foil experiment
That atoms have a positively charged nucleus.
'''an overemphasis on sociocultural differences'''
it looks like cheese on my balls with ketchup and mustard with applesuace
Lavoisier is not known for an atomic theory.
Opinions vary. The discovery of the atomic nucleus ("most of the atom is empty space")