In general terms, the primary benefits of strong state governments (in relation to a central or federal governing agency also operating in the same social setting) are two in number. First, they provide a more efficient and even more accountable governing body to handle in-state affairs at all levels of society. Second, they provide a distinct 'check' on federal power, which, because of weaknesses of human nature and perhaps also a natural tendency in itself, can easily outreach its rightful bounds or otherwise abuse its privileges and responsibilities.
A weak central government allows the various regions or provinces of a country to have more autonomy. This is especially useful if you have a country with fractious regional groups with vastly different interests. Such is the case with Switzerland; the different cantons have different organizational methods, different languages, and different laws. Rather than force the view of the majority on the minority, each canton can govern for itself.
bush
Stronger economics in country.
They feared that a strong central government would act like a monarchy.
no, it does not have a strong central government
The Federalists wanted a strong central government whereas the Republicans feared a strong central government.
Han ruled china by having a strong central government.
A strong central government
The Federalists wanted a strong central government. They benefitted because a strong central government was created.
the papers that urged strong central government was the articles of confederation
The Federalists wanted a strong central government whereas the Republicans feared a strong central government.
The Federalists wanted a strong central government.
No. The confederation created by Articles of Confederation was designed to have a weak central government and a strong state government.
The federalist wanted a strong Federal/Central government.