answersLogoWhite

0

What are some effects of absolute monarchy in England?

Updated: 8/21/2019
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are some effects of absolute monarchy in England?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Countries that have a absolute monarchy government?

Some countries that have Absolute monarchy would be Nevada,japan,England,montana,And basicly every country in the world


According to bossuet what is the benefit of absolute monarchy?

There are a few benefits to absolute monarchy. Some of the benefits are highly dependent and single enduring.


What is the difference between constitutional monarchy and an absolute monarchy?

In a constitutional monarchy, like in England, the monarch does not have much power at all, because there is a constitution. In an absolute monarchy, they have absolute power. In a constitutional monarchy, the power of the monarch is limited by some set of rules or document (e.g. a constitution), which sets out the powers given to the monarch. Other powers are given to other groups, commonly judges and a legislature. How much power is given to each group and the monarch varies widely, and is entirely up to the constitution of the country in question. In an absolute monarchy, the monarch is presumed to be God-(or other deity)-ordained, and rules with no limits on their power.


Which theory would a seventeenth-century king most likely supported?

Some choices would be nice for a "which" question, but in terms of political theories, most European Kings in the 1600s were absolutist and believed in the divine right of the monarchy, so ABSOLUTE MONARCHY or any derivative of that would be most supported. England, however, was already a constitutional monarchy by this point and the Kings of England knew that they would never be able to assert absolute power again, which meant that those kings would want something slightly different than absolute monarchy, but not terribly different.


Which theory would a seventeenth-century European king most likely support?

Some choices would be nice for a "which" question, but in terms of political theories, most European Kings in the 1600s were absolutist and believed in the divine right of the monarchy, so ABSOLUTE MONARCHY or any derivative of that would be most supported. England, however, was already a constitutional monarchy by this point and the Kings of England knew that they would never be able to assert absolute power again, which meant that those kings would want something slightly different than absolute monarchy, but not terribly different.


What events signified the end of absolute monarchy?

It depends entirely on the absolute monarchy in question. There are still absolute monarchies in some parts of the world, like Saudi Arabia or Brunei Darussalam


What is a government run the a king or queen?

A government run by a king or queen would be an absolute monarchy. Although, some nations, such as the United Kingdom, have a constitutional monarchy, where the queen does not have absolute power.


What are some advantages about monarchy?

One could argue that a clear line of succession is an advantage of a monarchy. From the perspective of the monarchy, absolute power would be another advantage.


What are some arguments for and against absolute monarchy as proposed by hobbes?

look for it in the book :D


What type of government did Queen Elizabeth I run?

A monarchy. She was the queen and she decided things.


What is the famous former leaders of absolute monarchy?

Some famous leaders include Louis XIV of France, Peter the Great of Russia, Ivan the Terrible of Russia, and Frederick William I of Prussia. They controlled the nobility and they transformed their armies from an absolute monarchy.


What did Parliament use that exercised some control over the king under England's?

Under England's Limited Monarchy.