The term "bad" cannot be applied and is subjective. Alexander the Great conquered the Persian empire and saved fellow Greeks from Persian harassment so for Greeks and many others under the Persian yoke he was seen as a liberator. For others who were killed in battle or who favored being under Persian rule he was the devil.
1. he became obsessed with power and being above the law
2. he became paranoid that some of his men (who were also his some of his closest friends) were trying to kill him so instead he killed them
3. he was very full of himself, became convinced that Zeus was his father, not Philip, and started to believe himself to be divine heritage)
Alexander was raised to hero status and the surviving records gloss over most of his discreditable actions. We do know that he murdered one of his close associates and had another of his generals executed, and that he wantonly destroyed Persepolis.
Then it is a matter of whether you consider waging massive war for a decade with enormous military and civilian casualties is good or bad, necessary or not, heroic or worthy of censure.
Alexander the great attacked Tyre killing 10,00 and enslaving 30,000. He also killed all males related to the king of Persia. Alexander the Great also attacked part of modern-day Pakistan, killing everyone in his way.
He killed innocent women and children. He killed 6,000 Thebians. 30,000 Thebians were sold into slavery.
He was neither; as a ruler and conquerer, he did good things but did bad things ei. killed many people when invading and conquering there country.
The Ancient Greek Bad Ruler Was Alexander The Great I Think.
it reaveled alexander was a very bad leader
Alexander The Great was probably good, because he tried to make all the land he conquered live in peace, but that didn't happen. Considering he is called 'the great' I would assume not.
When Alexander traveled to India near the end of his conquests, a sage told him he was to die in Babylon before reaching home. (He was right)
He was neither; as a ruler and conquerer, he did good things but did bad things ei. killed many people when invading and conquering there country.
The Ancient Greek Bad Ruler Was Alexander The Great I Think.
destroying civilisations and murdering people
Genghis Khan, Alexander the Great
it reaveled alexander was a very bad leader
Alexander The Great was probably good, because he tried to make all the land he conquered live in peace, but that didn't happen. Considering he is called 'the great' I would assume not.
the good things are that you could have a great time, while travelling. But the bad things are that you could get a bad disease or get stranded with no money but if i was you i would say go for it you will have a great time. x
When Alexander traveled to India near the end of his conquests, a sage told him he was to die in Babylon before reaching home. (He was right)
butter, sweets, chocolate , crisps ,pastry
Destroyed families which are the fabric of society.
Because he wanted ti let people no he was not that bad and was a hero not a villian
Bad things happen in groups of three because when a superstitious person notices a bad thing, he starts to wait for the next two bad things to make up the group. As soon as he has his group of three, he resets the counter and starts waiting for the next bad thing to happen (it will be the new #1). A superstitious person will wait as long as it takes to make up his group of three: sometimes five minutes is all it needs, but if five days is necessary, or five years - he can wait that long too. It would be possible to get bad things happening in groups of seven - if only we could train superstitious people to count so high.