The basic arguments FOR gun control are that it is needed to keep guns away from people that should not have them.
Only if everyone agrees to disagree
type into google gun control usa.
If you are "pro" in the gun control debate, you are for less gun control. In other words, you are "pro-gun".
There is no "gun control" amendment.
opposing.Versus, contra, counter"I am against gun control" could also be phrased "I'm opposed to gun control", "I'm anti-gun control", "I'm an opponent of gun control", "I disagree with the idea of gun control"
Gun Control
They have gun laws. Whether they actually have the words "gun control" within any of their firearms legislature, I don't know, but they do have gun control.
Yes, Ross Perot is for gun control. He was not a typical Conservative and was pro gun control and pro choice.
It is extremely anti-gun control.
If a person is writing about some issue or controversy, it is usually for the purpose of supporting one side of the argument, and attacking the opposing side. The side that the writer chooses is the writer's position. A writer can be pro-war or anti-war, pro-abortion or anti-abortion, pro-gun control or anti-gun control, etc.
A person against gun control. A pro-gun advocate. A pro-2A advocate (in the US).
Depends on WHICH gun control legislation you mean. In the US, there are already several thousand "gun control" laws on the books. However, they do not work. They DO keep honest people from being able to defend themselves from criminals.