Roman theater was done by ancient Romans. Greek theater was done by ancient Greeks. Hope I helped.
parthanon
An important difference between greek and Romans attitudes was that
Roman Theatre Greek Theatre Musical Theatre Romantic Theatre
The name. That's all. Greek: Aphrodite. Roman: Venus.
If you refer to theatre performances, Roman theatre was modelled on that of the Greeks. Indian and asian theatre were completely different.
The Western Empire was Latinised. The Eastern Empire was Greek.
Roman artist's focused on landscape painting.
The study of Greek and Roman history, culture, art, literature and theatre is called classics.
The main difference is that the Greek Orthodox do not recognize the authority of the Pope. The main similarity is that they are both Christian.
They both only let men perform
Scholars say theatre originated in Greece and was spread to Rome through Roman Imperialism. The Romans adopted Greek theatre to their specific purposes. In the style of "Bread and Circuses," Roman theatre was meant to entertain the masses with spectacle and violence. The naumachiae were elaborate portrayals of sea battles involving real water-filled arenas and massive scale fights where actors were likely to die in the action. Basic costuming indicated status using certain colors to show a character's class, and stock characters helped the audiences not get lost in all the action onstage. Greek theatre had a more didactic and religious aim. It was born of religious celebrations for different Greek gods and featured characters who faced moral struggles. Masks were popular, and a chorus was essential in highlighting moral themes. All in all, Greek theatre was born of religion, artistry, and necessity; Roman theatre was more for spectacular entertainment. This is not to say that Greek theatre was any more valid or necessary. The two styles simply served different purposes. It is important to remember that while Greek theatre provided artistic and scholastic foundations for the modern theatre, Roman theatre paved the way for a wide range of entertainment, including Opera and masques.
Scholars say theatre originated in Greece and was spread to Rome through Roman imperialism. The Romans adopted Greek theatre to their specific purposes. In the style of "Bread and Circuses," Roman theatre was meant to entertain the masses with spectacle and violence. The naumachiae were elaborate portrayals of sea battles involving real water-filled arenas and massive scale fights where actors were likely to die in the action. Basic costuming indicated status using certain colors to show a character's class, and stock characters helped the audiences not get lost in all the action onstage. Greek theatre had a more didactic and religious aim. It was born of religious celebrations for different Greek gods and featured characters who faced moral struggles. Masks were popular, and a chorus was essential in highlighting moral themes. All in all, Greek theatre was born of religion, artistry, and necessity; Roman theatre was more for spectacular entertainment. This is not to say that Greek theatre was any more valid or necessary. The two styles simply served different purposes. It is important to remember that while Greek theatre provided artistic and scholastic foundations for the modern theatre, Roman theatre paved the way for a wide range of entertainment, including opera and masques.