Want this question answered?
Using brutish mercenaries may have been a mistake if they were undisciplined or prone to committing atrocities. However, if they were effective in achieving the intended goals and did not harm innocent people, it may not have been a mistake. The moral and ethical implications of using such mercenaries can vary depending on the specific context and actions taken.
Because mercenaries were hard to try for war crimes. (:
Great Britain , and German mercenaries
these are trained soldiers who are already trained and who can afford equpment that may be better quality than the standard military stuff.
no because, the mercenaries were highly trained and were skilled. hope you like it. :D :)
no because, the mercenaries were highly trained and were skilled. hope you like it. :D :)
no because, the mercenaries were highly trained and were skilled. hope you like it. :D :)
no because, the mercenaries were highly trained and were skilled. hope you like it. :D :)
The Hessians were being paid to fight in the war, they were mercenaries
No, because the mercenaries are foreign soldiers who fought not out of loyalty, but for pay and they payed mercenaries so the American soldiers don't die.
its big and heavy but very painfull
What are disadvantages of using car?