We can come up with only three:
-- hyperbolic
-- parabolic
-- elliptical (including circular, a special case of elliptical)
Circles, ellipses, parabolas and hyperbolas are all conic sections, the intersection of a plane with a right-circular cone.
Orbitals in quantum chemistry have shapes that are spheres for s-orbitals, dumbbells for p-orbitals, and different types of d-orbital are either pairs of crossed dumbbells, or a dumbbell with a central collar. f-orbitals have yet more complex shapes, but they are not usually considered in textbooks.
In physics, p and d orbitals have rather different shapes. A s-orbital is still a sphere, but p-orbitals are either dumbbells or tyres, and d-orbitals are collared dumbbells, double (point to point) cones, or tyres.
Orbits are all forms of conic section, the curve formed by intersecting a plane with a symmetrical circular cone.
The shape of a conic section is defined by a parameter called eccentricity, written as e. In order of eccentricity the four orbital shapes are: circles (e=0), ellipses (0<e<1), parabolas (e=1) and hyperbolas (e>1). Planets' orbits are ellipses with e less than 0.1, so they are approximately circular. You can only get a hyperbolic orbit with a body coming in at high speed from outside the solar system, which is extremely rare.
You can make conic sections by shining a torch on a wall (a torch with a old fashioned bulb, not LEDs). It produces a cone of light, and the wall gives the intersection, so on the wall you can create those four shapes. Shining it straight at the wall gives a circle, slightly off gives an ellipse, then with one side of the cone parallel to the wall you get a parabola, and turning it further creates a hyperbola.
If you take Newton's formula for gravitation, MASH it together with Calculus and
Geometry, and play with them long enough, you come up with all the properties
of the orbits that we see all around us in space. Here are some of the characteristics
of gravitational orbits:
-- The entire orbit is in a plane; it's flat, and it would lie completely on a big-enough
sheet of paper.
-- The shapes of all possible paths that gravity can cause a body to take are called
the "conic sections". They're all shapes that you can get by cutting through a cone
while you hold the 'knife' at different angles.
-- If the orbiting body hasn't enough energy to escape the central body, then
it moves in an orbit the shape of an ellipse, with the central body at one focus.
-- A very special case of the ellipse, if everything is just exactly right, is a circle ...
so rare that it's virtually never seen in nature.
-- The imaginary line between the orbiting body and the central body 'sweeps out'
equal areas in equal times. That means that the orbiting body moves fastest when it's
closest to the central body, and slowest when it's farthest out in its orbit.
-- For all the bodies in orbits around the same central body ... like the planets, moons,
comets, and asteroids in the solar system ... (the square of the time it takes a body
to complete an orbit) divided by (the cube of the orbiting body's average distance from
the central body) is always the same number. That means those with larger orbits
move slower in their orbit, and take much longer to complete each revolution.
-- A small body that sails by another larger one, but has enough energy to keep going
and not get captured, has its path 'bent' by the mutual gravitational attraction
between the two of them. Technically, that's also an 'orbit' ... it's just an "open" one.
In general, every open orbit has the shape of a "hyperbola".
-- The special case that's just exactly on the borderline between the strongest closed (elliptical)
orbit and the weakest open one, is the path called a "parabola". Like the circle, it only
happens when everything is just exactly right, so it's never seen in nature.
-- Planets have elliptical orbits that are very 'un-eccentric', and look very circular.
There's not much difference between a planet's nearest and farthest distance
from the sun.
-- Comets have orbits that are very 'eccentric'; the difference between their nearest
and farthest distance from the sun can be gigantic. Since they're so small, they're
only visible for the short time when they come in close to the sun.
-- Sometimes we can observe a comet, and not be able to tell whether or not it will
ever come back again. Why is that ?
The comet may be in a closed, elliptical orbit that's so eccentric ... long and thin ...
that it returns to the inner solar system only once in a thousand years. Or, it may be
in an open orbit, just sailing past the sun in an open, hyperbolic orbit, and never
to return.
We can only see the comet for a relatively short time, while it's at its closest approach
to the sun. And at that part of the orbit, an open, low-energy hyperbola and a closed,
high-energy, highly-eccentric ellipse, have practically the same shape. Over the small
portion of the comet's orbit that we can see, the difference would be so small that we can't
measure it, and we really can't say when ... or whether ... that comet will ever return.
Electrons are distributed using 2n2 formula, where n = 1,2,3,4,5...........i.e. no of orbital! hence for 1st orbital, no. of electrons = 2*(1)2 = 2*1 = 2 similar procedure for other orbitals also! bt still if any orbital, except 1st, contains 8 electrons it is considered to be stable! Total electrons in sulphur atom = 32 1st orbital = 2 2nd orbital = 8 3rd orbital = 18 4th orbital = 4 Electron in outermost(here, 4th) orbital = 4
The orbitals represent the possibility to find the electron at a particular place around the nucleus.Its an abstract term.The orbital can't affect the electron because the electron itself forms the orbital.So the orbital does not affect the electron, the electron affects the shape of the orbital.More specially, the orbital has some kind of shape because of the specific energetic condition of the electron.And with these specific, energetic conditions only specific shapes are ''allowed''.
There can be a maximum of 14 electrons in any "f" orbital. However, the 3f orbital does not exist. f orbitals are only found in quantum energy level 4 and above.
The elements which falls under the group 16 has 4 electrons in its outer p orbital...
In orbitals and shells. Orbitals are hard to describe because they are shaped by relativistic quantum mechanics and can only be visualized as probability clouds not as physical shapes. Shells are composed of sets of orbitals. s orbital probability clouds are spherical. p orbital probability clouds are egg shaped ellipsoids. d orbital probability clouds are hour glass shaped with a donut around the middle unattached. f orbital probability clouds are hour glass shaped with two distorted donuts around the middle unattached. etc. Shell 1 has a single s orbital. Shell 2 has a single s orbital and 3 p orbitals. Shell 3 has a single s orbital, 3 p orbitals, and 5 d orbitals. Shell 4 has a single s orbital, 3 p orbitals, 5 d orbitals, and 7 f orbitals. etc.
The number of possible different orbital shapes for the third energy level is 3. For n equals 4 the number of possible orbital shape is 4.
The shape of a p orbital is like a dumbbell-shaped. P orbital shapes depends on the quantum numbers affiliated with an energy state.
Schrodinger wave equation
1
The shape of a p orbital is like a dumbbell-shaped. P orbital shapes depends on the quantum numbers affiliated with an energy state.
An atom can be categorized as units and subunits, to begin with a shell, in it we have subshells followed by orbitals, each orbital has different shapes, an orbital can have a maximum of 2 electrons, we can define an orbital as a region where the possibility of finding an electron is maximum.
Quadrilaterals are 4 sided shapes
Shapes that do not have 4 sides are not 4 sided quadrilaterals.
I believe you can draw more of 4 sided shapes.:)
The "s" orbital is circular; the "p" orbital is shaped like a dumbell. The "d" orbitals are like a double dumbell, though the dz2 sub orbital is like a dumbell with an annulus around it. Finally, the f orbital are much more complex. They are like a quadruple dumbell with the lobes pointing towards the 8 corners of a cube.
4-sided shapes, because if you think about it, triangles (3-sided shapes) aren't that varied in sizes and types. 4-sided shapes can be as crazy as possible, so... yeah. 4-sided shapes are definitely more varied in drawing forms.
4-sided shapes, because if you think about it, triangles (3-sided shapes) aren't that varied in sizes and types. 4-sided shapes can be as crazy as possible, so... yeah. 4-sided shapes are definitely more varied in drawing forms.