To the extent that religion wants to claim to be true, it can be disproven by science.
To the extent that religion wants to claim to be mysterious, unknowable, and a poem, there is no conflict.
Science and religion appear to offer conflicting visions about how the universe works. Science tries to identify laws of nature, which describe the universe in mathematical terms; certain things happen in certain ways because that is how the universe is, as we have observed it. Religion is concerned with the actions and motives of God and sometimes other supernatural beings, who created and control the universe and who are responsible for the way things happen, rather than laws of nature. Scientists generally see events as being accidental and unplanned, religious people generally believe that everything happens in accordance with God's plan.
The biggest ongoing argument between science and religion concerns Darwinian evolution vs. biblical creationism. Did life evolve, or was it created by God? It is sometimes claimed that we can have both of these simultaneously, that God uses evolution as His tool for creating life. The issue is complex.
The conflict between science and religion in 19th century was about the creation accounts.
It can't. Religion is mythology not science.
There's nothing special about opposing points of view. There are debates between science and science, and debates between religion and religion as well. For as long we don't know all the absolute truths, and possibly even after that, people will disagree.
There are many books that delve into the relationship between science and religion; however, many of these books have a bias towards science or a bias towards religion. Some books that delve into the relationship between science and religion are "Science and Christianity: Conflict or Coherence?" by Henry F. Schaefer III and "Rock of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life" by Stephen Jay Gould.
there isn't a connection between sience and religion but with hindis there is a prediction with the moons and stars
the inability of science and religion to blend
He thought they were religion and science were integrally related.
Frank M. Turner has written: 'Between science and religion' -- subject(s): Religion and science, England, History
Religion is not a science.
Religion and science, at least in the absolute sense(where it is assumed that having religious believes is a form of non-education) are incompatible. Religion offers certainty where none exists, science finds new ways to prove itself wrong.
Science is known while religion is unknown.Science is physically proven while reliogion is mentally proven. Thus science is in the past while religion is in the future. However, both science and religion does not raise the standard of human evolution and the middle path between these two extremes is 'spiritual'. A spiritual journey travel inwards while science and religion delve on outwardly matters.
Religion and science