The pros of the NAIS are that exporters can say to their customers that we are BSE or FMD or some other disease free. It doesnt mean we are but they can say that. APHIS can track an animal from birth to death if it turns up with a disease. The cons are that the program is expensive for both small farmers and the taxpayer. Over 33 million dollars have already been spent on this program and it has registered only 12 percent of farms. The tagging and tracking have not even been implemented so you can do the math with over 2 million sites to be registered. As the number of animals you have goes down the cost per head goes up. In Australia the average cost is $37 per head and the countries importing Australian cattle are still asking for testing. Another issue is the reporting of movement. All instances where an animal comes in contact with animals from another site must be reported within 24 hours. THat means you must call or email the USDA or its designee at the end of each day and report births, deaths, sales, purchases, trips to the vet, trail rides, shows, 4H events, escapes if the animals come in contact with someone elses herd, off site breeding. While USDA says this program is voluntary they have also said that if "enough" people do not sign up by 2009 they will make it mandatory. The penalties in other states range from $1000 to $5000 per incident for non-compliance. Sound voluntary to you? Last the USDA's only response to a disease outbreak is to kill everything within 10km of an outbreak on a "presumptive diagnosis". This means you will have veterinarians who may or may not have had more than one rotation of exotic diseases looking at your animals and making a diagnosis without testing. Field tests are available but the USDA does not plan on using them. FMD which is preventable and treatable is on the list. So is CAE also preventable and manageable. If your neighbor goes to the sale barn and buys a sick kid your whole herd could be destroyed for a manageable outbreak. Remember UK in 2001? THis program is unconstitutional and has no law passed in congress to back it up. Bills are being presented at this moment which will make it mandatory and make electronic tagging and chipping mandatory. WRite or call your congressmen and protest loudly. Australia is having a terrible time with this system and is asking for impact studies. NAIS is bad business. For mor information go to www.nonais.org www.libertyark.net www.stopanimalid.org Read the Draft Standards and Strategic Plan for yourself then read the Guide to NAIS for Small Producers. THey contradict each other and the plans are in the Federal Register not the Guide. Read GAO 02-214 for the USDa repsonse to outbreaks. There is a lot of information out there educate yourselves.
Premise ID, the first component of the three parts of the USDA's proposed National Animal Identification System NoNAIS website. It was proposed in April 2005 and was supposed to be implemented in 2006. By January 2010 the USDA had failed to implement NAIS due to strong opposition from farmers and consumers. See here for a time line of NAIS.
Something that many of the small farmers in the United States think is VERY scary! It will force them to spend thousands of dollars needlessly. It is supposedly to help with traceback capability in case of contamination. In fact, that contamination happens in the USDA slaughter plant. The animals don't need to be traced back farther than that. NAIS will require that every animal of the small producer have a $10-25 microchip (for which the producer must buy a $300 reader, even if he only has one steer.) And, yet.... producers of large herds don't have to chip each animal. They are allowed to group animals that will travel together from birth pasture to slaughter. Only small producers are required to chip individual animals. Additionally, every time an animal is moved, the owner much log into a subscription database & pay to report that movement. Again, while the big producer can report a group movement, the small producer must report each animal separately. There are many small producers who believe that it is a move by BigAg to run the small guy competition out of business, because the small guy that you can visit is getting too much market share. It's all a different view. The small guy has one & BigAg (along w/ it's governmental marketing department) has another. As the 2nd paragraph in the governmental answer below says, the plan is being developed by BigAg & the government. It is being fought tooth & nail by nearly every small producer in the country!!! The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is a national program intended to identify animals and track them as they come into contact with, or commingle with, animals other than herdmates from their premises of origin. The system is being developed for all animals that will benefit from rapid trace-backs in the event of a disease concern. Currently, working groups comprised of industry and government representatives are developing plans for cattle, swine, sheep, goats, horses, poultry, bison, deer, elk, llamas, and alpacas. Already, many of these species can be identified through some sort of identification system, but these systems are not consistent across the country. Tracing an animal's movements can therefore be a time-consuming endeavor during a disease investigation, especially if the animal has moved across State lines. In April 2004, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced the framework for implementing the NAIS - an animal identification and tracking system that will be used in all States and that will operate under national standards. When fully operational, the system will be capable of tracing a sick animal or group of animals back to the herd or premises that is the most likely source of infection. It will also be able to trace potentially exposed animals that were moved out from that herd or premises. The sooner animal health officials can identify infected and exposed animals and premises, the sooner they can contain the disease and stop its spread. The NAIS will enhance U.S. efforts to respond to intentionally or unintentionally introduced animal disease outbreaks more quickly and effectively. USDA's long-term goal is to establish a system that can identify all premises and animals that have had direct contact with a foreign animal disease or a domestic disease of concern within 48 hours of discovery. The first step in implementing the NAIS is identifying and registering premises that house animals. Such premises would include locations where livestock and poultry are managed, marketed, or exhibited. Knowing where animals are located is the key to efficient, accurate, and cost-effective epidemiologic investigations and disease-control efforts. USDA anticipates that all States will have the capability to register premises according to the national standards by 2005. Officials with USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) are currently training State officials how to use a standardized premises registration system. USDA is also evaluating alternative registration systems that States or others have developed and want to use, to ensure these systems meet the national standards. In addition, USDA is working with States and industry to educate the public about the NAIS. As premises are registered, another component of the NAIS animal identification will be integrated into the system. Unique animal identification numbers (AINs) will be issued to individually identified premises. In the case of animals that move in groups through the production chain--such as swine and poultry--the group will be identified through a group/lot identification number (Group/Lot IDs). USDA is developing the standards for collecting and reporting information, but industry will determine which type of identification method works best for each species. These methods could include radio frequency identification tags, retinal scans, DNA, or others. As long as the necessary data are sent to USDA's information repositories in a standardized form, it will be accepted. USDA will build upon existing identification systems and allow for a transition period from systems currently defined in the Code of Federal Regulations before requiring AINs or Group/Lot IDs. Working with States and industry, USDA will also evaluate various animal identification technologies to determine how the collection of animal movement records can best be automated. As premises are registered and animals or groups of animals are identified based on the standard protocols, USDA will begin collecting information about animal movements from one premises to another. With an efficient, effective animal tracking system in place, USDA will be able to perform rapid tracebacks in case of an animal disease outbreak. As envisioned, only Federal, State, and Tribal animal health authorities would have direct access to the national premises and animal identification information repositories. They need this information to accomplish their job of safeguarding animal health. USDA is investigating various options to protect the confidentiality of the information. It is important to note that the national repositories will include information only for animal and disease tracking purposes. Proprietary production data will remain in private databases. If USDA decides to make all or parts of the NAIS mandatory, APHIS will follow the normal rulemaking process. The public will have the opportunity to comment upon any proposed regulations.
Nais Lago's birth name is Nais La Gatella.
Nais Lago was born on February 25, 1914, in Fiume, Hungary, Austria-Hungary [now Rijeka, Croatia].
Kagustuhan, Nais or Habilin in terms of "he had a will for his children"
undesirable in Tagalog: hindi kanais-nais
Tagalog translation of DESIRABLE: kanais-nais
The meaning of the observation 'Je nais, c'est quoi [alors]?' is I'm born, so what? In the word-by-word translation, the personal pronuon 'je' means 'I'. The verb 'nais' means '[I] am born'. The demonstrative pronoun 'ce'* means 'this'. The verb 'est' means '[he/she/it] is'. The pronoun 'quoi' means 'what'. *The letter 'e' drops in front of a word that begins with a vowel or unaspirated 'h'.
Go to this website: http://www.pimall.com/nais/n.repo.html
je nais pas de réponse
kritikal, mapandisgrasya,hindi kanais-nais ( harshly critical, injurious, painful)
Amable = nice (se pronuncia: nais)
Preity Zinta isn't married yet. But she is dating Nais Wadia these days
The word "Nais" or "Ness" means miracle in Hebrew as well as Aramaic.
i will go to the market and buy something
It's 'Je ne sais pas' and that means 'I don't know'.
Kanais nais pagmasdan ang batang malinis na pangagatawan
This is gibberish. As such, it reads "I born itself not madmadmad".
sa ma nimo! :- )
isang liham na nais mag apply sa isang companya
tumutukoy sa kaisipang nais sabihin mg may akda.
pagkakaisa para sa kalayaan
Look up; www.pimall.com/nais/n.tel.tape.law.html