answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

1.) How gasses in space diffuse, and are not affected by gravity unless there is a big chunk of matter there, or a supernova compresses the gas (never been observed). This obviouslyproves that it is likely that the 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars out there were made by random processes and chance events.

2.) That (even though) mutations have only been observed being limited to small changes within a species, they somehowcreated new organs.

P.S. EVERY mutation must have happened within 10,000 years, because the sun is shrinking at about 5ft. (in diameter) every minute, and anywhere above 10,000 years, and the sun would be so big, it would fry every form of life on earth. (even though scientists insist it took millions of years)

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

The main types of evidence are:

-comparative genetics (comparing the differences in genetic material between different life forms)

-comparative physiology (comparing the body designs of different species)

-geographical distribution (findings related to how organisms are more distantly related from each other the further away they live)

-Paleontology (remains of animals that lived a long time ago and how they are changed over time)

-observed natural selection (direct evidence that organisms are changing in response to pressures from the environment)

-artificial selection (organisms that changed as a result of human intervention, breeds of dogs for example)

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

8y ago

Molecular evidence: similar proteins and genes found in closely related species, even if those genes are not used by an organism.

Fossil evidence: organisms changing form over time through the fossil record.

Direct observation of evolution: Traits in a population can be measured over time, as they change from one generation to the next, evolution occurs because that is the definition of evolution.

Three types of evidence are: fossil, biological, and genetic.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Well firstly there is the fossil evidence.

Here's a short list of transitional fossils

Cladoselache

tristychius

ctenacanthus

paleospinax

spathobatis

Protospinax

Acanthodians

cheirolepis

mimia

Canobius

Aeduella

Parasemionotus

Oreochima

leptolepis

Osteolepis

Eusthenopteron

Sterropterygion

tiktaalik

panderichthys

Elpistostege

Obruchevichthys

Hynerpeton

Acanthostega

Ichthyostega

Pholidogaster

Pteroplax

Dendrerpeton acadianum

Archegosaurus decheni

Eryops megacephalus

Trematops

Amphibamus lyelli

Doleserpeton annectens

vieraella

Proterogyrinus

Limnosclis

Tseajaia

Solenodonsaurus

Hylonomus

Paleothyris

Captorhinus

Petrolacosaurus

Araeoscelis

Apsisaurus

Claudiosaurus

Planocephalosaurus

Protorosaurus

Prolacerta

Proterosuchus

Hyperodapedon

Trilophosaurus

Coelophysis

Deinonychus

Oviraptor

Lisboasaurus

Archeopteryx

Sinornis

Ambiortus

Hesperornis

Ichthyornis

Paleothyris

Protoclersydrops

Clepsydrops

Archaeothyris

Varanops

Haptodus

Dimetrodon

Sphenacodon

Biarmosuchia

Procynosuchus

Dvinia

Thrinaxodon

Cynognathus

Diademodon

Proelesodon

Probainognathus

Exaeretodon

Oligokyphus

Kayentatherium

Pachygenelus

Diarthrognathus

Adelobasileus

Sinoconodon

Kuehneotherium

Eozostrodon

Morganucodon

Haldanodon

Peramus

Endotherium

Kielantherium

Aegialodon

Steropodon

Vincelestes

Pariadens

Kennalestes

Cimolestes

Procerberus

Gypsonictops

Palaechthon

Purgatorius

Cantius

Pelycodus

Amphipithecus

Pondaungia

Parapithecus

Propliopithecus

Aegyptopithecus

Proconsul

Limnopithecus

Dryopithecus

Pakicetus

Nalacetus

Ichthyolestes

Gandakasia

Ambulocetus

Himalayacetus

Attockicetus

Remingtonocetus

Dalanistes

Kutchicetus

Andrewsiphius

Indocetus

Qaisracetus

Takreacetus

Artiocetus

Babiacetus

Protocetus

Pappocetus

Eocetus

Georgiacetus

Natchitochia

Dorudon

Ancalacetus

Zygorhiza

Saghacetus

Chrysocetus

Gaviacetus

Pontogeneus

Basilosaurus

Basiloterus

Sahelanthropus tchadensis

Orrorin tugenensis

Ardipthecus ramidus

Ardipithecus kadabba

Australopithecus afarensis

Australopithecus africanus

Australopithecus anamensis

Australopithecus garhi

Australopithecus aethiopicus

Australopithecus boisei

Australopithecus robustus

Australopithecus bahreghazali

Homo habilis

Homo rudolfensis

Homo erectus.

And Neanderthal DNA.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Natural selection and DArwin

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Anonymous

Lvl 1
3y ago

Accept fossil evidence, anatomical evidence, molecular evidence

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are two pieces of evidence for evolution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are two types of evidence that suggest that evolution has occurred?

The two types are Dna, and fossils


What two types of evidence that suggest that evolution has occurred?

The two types are Dna, and fossils


What is two pieces of evidence that English is the global?

global warming?


What are types of evidence that suggest that evolution has occurred?

The two types are Dna, and fossils


What is indirect evidence?

Indirect Evidence of Evolution - is looking for signs of the results of evolution. - is evidence that can be used to deduce what you are trying to understand.


Is similarities an early development not evidence for evolution?

It does hint at common ancestry so it is "evidence" of evolution.


What is two pieces of evidence that dry tea is a mixture and not a substance?

Dust and leaves


Why do you suppose McLoughlin went out of his way to assist American settlers give two pieces of evidence?

John McLoughlin went out of his way to assist American settlers by giving two pieces of evidence to maintain law and order.


What was wrong with lamarck's theory of evolution'?

His two main concepts, acquired characteristics and a innate " desire " to evolve, were both unsupported by any evidence and were not the way evolution happens. So, Lamarck's " theory " ( in the vulgar sense ) was utterly refuted by the actual evidence and process of evolution.


Homology is evidence of what?

Evolution


How does Darwin's theory of evolution explain microevolution but not macroevolution?

Those terms need to be done away with. There is no such division in the theory of evolution by natural selection, even in Darwin's time. There is evolution and speciation. One flows seamlessly into the other over time and we have myriad pieces of evidence supporting this.


What are two pieces evidence for cracks in the ocean floor?

molten material and drilling samples