answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The argument for Jesus being the Son of God is that The Bible says so. If there is any doubt as to the reliability of the Bible, then there is no support for the argument that Jesus is the Son of God.

User Avatar

Wiki User

βˆ™ 13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What argument exists for Jesus being the son of God?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

If Jesus is not God then how can you be saved?

Being saved or not being saved is a matter of religious faith. There never has been any extra-biblical proof that Jesus is God, or even that God exists. The consequence is that, if Jesus is God then those who believe in him have a hope of being saved; if God does not exist, then salvation has no meaning and our reward for good works is here on earth; if God exists, but Jesus is not God, then it depends on whether God is angry at those who mistakenly worshipped a false God, or is willing to forgive them.


How does Christianity show that god exists?

The bible shows that god created every thing that exists an he has a son named jesus who died for our sins. The bible talks about god being the father the son and the holy ghost the father as in god the son as in jesus and the holy ghost as in our spirits after being saved.


What exactly is an ontological argument?

It is a philosophical argument that God exists. While many philosopher's theories had many differences in derivation and reasoning, the conclusion to all ontological arguments was that the superior being of God is a reality.


Why did god not help jesus?

because he does not exists!!


What are the five ontological propositions for the existence of God?

The ontological argument for the existence of God was devised by St. Anselm of Canterbury, who lived 1033-1106. By philosophical argument, he attempted to prove that the denial of the proposition "God exists" is self-contradictory. It consists of five propositions:By the term 'God' is meant a being than which none greater can be conceivedWhether we affirm or deny the existence of God, a being than which none greater can be conceived exists in the understandingIt is possible to conceive of a being than which none greater can be conceived existing not only in the understanding but in reality as well; and this is greaterIf, therefore a being than which none greater can be conceived exists only in the understanding, it is not a being than which none greater can be conceivedTherefore a being than which none greater can be conceived exists also in reality.Unfortunately, for a number of reasons, it is not a sound argument. The simplest one for a person not educated in philosophy is to replace "the being (God) than which none greater can be conceived" by an island none more beautiful than which can be conceived. This island therefore exists, although in practice we know that it does not.


Which theory maintains that the universe exists and appears for some reason and is an argument for the existence of God?

teleology


Who was the Saint who formed an ontological proof of God?

The Ontological Argument, first proposed by St. Anselm, consists of five propositions: 1. By the term "God" is meant a being than which none greater can be conceived. 2. Whether we affirm or deny the existence of God, a being than which none greater can be conceived exists in the understanding. 3. It is possible to conceive of a being than which none greater can be conceived existing not only in the understanding but in reality as well; and this is greater. 4. If, therefore, a being than which none greater can be conceived exists only in the understanding, it is not a being than which none greater can be conceived. 5. Therefore, a being than which none greater can be conceived exists also in reality. Anselm's argument, as with similar ontological arguments raised by later theologians, fails because it is not a sound argument.


Which god does StAnthony believe in?

St.Anthony believe in one God The Only God that Exists and its Jesus Christ and His Dad our Main God


What is the ontological argument?

The ontological argument is an argument used to prove the existence of God from premises derived using a priorireasoning, that is, using reason and intuition alone.Some examples of ontological arguments:Avicenna's argument: The universe consists of a chain of definite beings, which can give existence to other things. Similarly, each thing that exists must also have been given existence, or caused, by another thing. This chain of being continues almost infinitely, however, there must have been some initial cause which was not caused by anything else. Essentially, some sort of "uncaused cause". This, he argued, must be a wholly self-sufficient and perfect being, whose existence does not depend on anything else. He determined this being to be God.Descartes' argument: As we understand God to be the most perfect being, he must exist. The reason for this is that a being that exists only in the mind is not as great or as perfect as a being that exists both in the mind and in actuality. Thus, perfection necessitates existence.


What is an ontological argument?

The ontological argument is a philosophical argument for the existence of God that is based on the concept of existence or being. It suggests that the very concept of God being the greatest possible being necessarily implies his existence. This argument has been presented and debated by various philosophers throughout history, such as Anselm of Canterbury and RenΓ© Descartes.


How do you claim that Jesus is God?

Just as the belief that God exists is a matter of faith alone, so also the belief that Jesus is God is a matter of faith, based largely on the Gospel of John.


Where are St Thomas' five proofs of the existence of God?

St Thomas Aquinas relied on what is known as the Cosmological Argument for the existence of God. He claimed that there were five valid ways to prove God exists, although thre of them are essentially restatements of the same things. Essentially his view was that some contingent beings exist; contingent beings require a noncontingent ground of being (a "necessary thing") in order to exist; therefore a noncontingent ground of being exists. This is not a great deal different to the Ontological Argument. Aquinas' theological positions involved making unprovable assumptions from which to prove the unprovable.