(The Gospel according to) St. Matthew 2:16.
I am not certain of the question. The answer to the question as asked seems simple - Herod is the name of Herod. But I suspect that the writer wants to ask something else. Maybe English is his/her second language. Please restate the question or ask it in your native language.Answer:Herod the Great (37 BC to 4 BC) was the Herod at the time of Jesus' birth and toddler years when the killing of the Innocence was ordered by him.Herod Antipas who was one of three sons, assumed the throne and ruled from 4 BC to 39 AD. He is the Herod of the time of crucifixion of Jesus - 31 AD.There was also another son given this name - Herod Archelaus who was just like his father the Great and was eventually killed by the Romans in 6 AD.The third and final son was named differently - Philip.
Phasael, who was ruler of Jerusalem while Herod ruled Galilee. Joseph, a general in Herod's army who is killed in battle. And Pheroras, who Herod banishes after much trouble. Also a sister named Salome.
No one knows exactly when king Herod was born. In some historic documentation, it says Herod was born about 73, and died about 4 BC. But, this would have to be totally wrong, since Herod was king when Jesus Christ was born, and also had ordered that thousands of male infants be murdered in order to destroy the Christ Child.
Acts 12:1, 2 - Now about that time Herod the king stretched out his hand to harass some from the church. Then he killed James the brother of John with the sword.[NKJV]
He had several: Doris, Mariamne I, daughter of Hasmonean Alexandros, Mariamne II, daughter of High-Priest Simon, Malthace, Cleopatra of Jerusalem, Pallas, Phaidra, Elpis, a cousin (name unknown), and a niece (name unknown), plus many concubines.
You're probably thinking of Herod the Great. According to Matthew chapter 2, Herod ordered that all children of Bethlehem (not Jerusalem) age two and under be killed.
King Herod became very angry. He ordered all males under the age of 2 to be killed.
Archelaus, the son of Herod the Great, was discussed in the book of Matthew. He is specifically found in chapter 2, verse 22.
No, he wasn't. It was his son who ordered the death of the John the Baptist.
Under the order of Pontius Pilate, after many of the Jews denounced Jesus, Jesus was killed by the Romans. The King at the time was Caesar, but he had no direct role. Herod Antipas was tetrarch of Galliee at the time, but he returned Jesus to Pilate, who reluctantly ordered the crucifixion of Jesus.
Matthew 2:16 "Then when Herod saw that he had been tricked by the magi, he became very enraged, and sent and slew all the male children who were in Bethlehem and all its vicinity, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had determined from the magi."
The birthday of Pharaoh is mentioned in Genesis chapter 40, verses 20-23. The only other birthday celebration mentioned in the Bible was that of King Herod's in Matthew chapter 14 verses 6-11.
King Herod ordered the killing of all children aged two or under, in the hope that he would kill the future king of the Jews.
Yes it is true that the wise men came to see Jesus . As History states that King Herod ordered all boys below two years to be killed as the wisemen cheated King Herod.
Matthew chapter 2 verse 1 states: "Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king..." in the King James Version of the Bible.
Herod was the king who ordered all baby boys killed, hoping to get rid of the One he thought was threatening his throne.
A:According to Matthew's Gospel, King Herod the Great ordered the death of all baby boys under two years old after he received a visit from the magi. This account is disputed. One reason for this scepticism is that the order forms part of a series of events by which the author of Matthew creates a parallel between Jesus and Moses. Another is that the Jewish historian, Josephus, reported every criticism of Herod for which he could find any record, yet made no mention of Matthew's Slaughter of the Innocents. Scholars say there is insufficient evidence that the magi even existed.