it would appear black because no red light strikes it
Black
BLACK because the apple absorbs the blue light and there would be no light to reflect.
bright purple. (ultra violet).
whoever knows Matthew cruz write under my message that they do!
vcvmcvmcvm
red
White.
turquoise(or turquiose)
It would appear black because the object would not reflect any of the colors of light back.
all colors except red will appear black in red light
It would depend on whether or not the dye for the cloth was developed in natural light , sunlight is a natural light , light created by some forms of man made light give off their own spectrum of color , a dye developed under these types of light would not appear the same in sunlight. But generally most dyes are quality controlled to appear as they should under natural light.
The blue pants appear black because they are absorbing the red wavelengths. The shirt must not be the same color as the light, because using basic knowledge of how light works, if it really was red along with the stage light, it would appear red as well. Therefore, all of these clothing items are absorbing the light and not reflecting it back as the colors they should be under white light.
The reason a black object is described as "a black object" is becasuse even under white light, where every color is available, the thing absorbs all of them, and doesn't reflect any color. Illuminating it with light of only a single color isn't going to change that. It'll still appear black.
The cloth would be wite because if it were any other color the colored light would mix with the color of the cloth and make a different color.
Why do you call it a "white object" ? Could it be because it looks white under white light ... light composed of every color ? Well then, the object must reflect every color. So it appears to be the color of whatever light you illuminate it with. Yellow under yellow light, etc.
It will appear as "d".
it will be black