What did dred Scott do?
The Dred Scott Case, during the Civil War, was a large controversy about African America rights and freedoms and whether they applied in "free states" that didn't allow slavery. See answer to "Who was Dred Scott" :)
dred Scott is African
Dred Scott lived in missouri
Dred Scott was in the Union.
to oppose dred scott.
Dred Scott lost
What are some characteristics of Dred Scott
dred Scott is African American
Dred Scott`s fll name was Dred Scott v. sandford
No, there is no autobiography available for Dred Scott. But there is a ton of websites that offer information about him. The Encyclopedia also has great information about Dred Scott.
Dred Scott was born into slavery in 1795.
Dred Scott was married, he also had two daughters.
Dred Scott rose the awareness of slavery.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
Dred Scott married Harriet Robinson in 1856.
According to Chief Justice Roger Taney's ruling on the Dred Scott case. Nothing is the answer. Dred Scott is just as much property as a mule.
dred scott did not get his freedom but he found a wife and soon died of tuberculosis
Dred Scott was a slave and he tried to get his freedom by going to court and talk it out but he failed
The origins of the Dred Scott case are due to the I.C.U.P organization
Dred Scott is famous because he was a slave that sued for the freedom of his family and lost. The trial took place in 1857, and the case is known as Dred Scott vs. Sandford.
Dred Scott "Key"
Dred Scott (1795 - September 17, 1858), was an African-American slave in the United States who unsuccessfully sued for his freedom and that of his wife and their two daughters in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857, popularly known as "the Dred Scott Decision
Dred Scott v. Sandford : 1857 .
Nothing Dred Scott died in 1858,years before the war.
Dred Scott died of tuberculosis just a few months after gaining his freedom.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
The Dred Scott case of 1857 maintained the southern thinking that, as a slave, Dred Scott was no more than property. He was not entitled to citizenship, nor the right to sue.
Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea
Dred Scott being a black man was denied because Black Peple had "no rights"
Dred Scott is famous for the start of the civil war between the union army of the north and the south.
The Dred Scott case effected the nation.It effect the nation by causing it to split the nation.
The Dred Scott case nullified the Missouri Compromise.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Dred Scott was a slave. When his owner moved to a free state and died, Scott argued that he should be free. He lost the case.
The Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sanford did not decide if Dred Scott was a slave or not, but that slaves (and their descendants) could not be counted as US citizens and had no right to sue in court.
No, the 14th Amendment supersedes the Dred Scott decision.
Dred scott being deemed as property angered northers abolitionists, and the union
The Dred Scott Decision helped to precipitate the Civil War, but did not take place during it.
The name of the slave that sued for his freedom in the Dred Scott vs Sandford case, was Dred Scott. He tried unsuccessfully to sue for the freedom of himself, his wife and their two daughters.
because they said "slaves are property" and said that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional and they wanted to keep slaves out of western territory and any slaves found free would be back in captivity and even though Dred Scott was free for 19 years they still made him to be a slave because of the Dred Scott vs. Sanford .That is how Dred Scott was discriminated.
It ruled that Dred Scott who was a freed slaved was no more than property and that no slave has any rights.
Dred Scott or The Dred Scott Decision/case
Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.
Dred Scott (1795?–1858)
Dred Scott was found guilty in the Dred Scott v. Sanford case. This caused the African Americans to not be allowed to fight for freedom in court.
Scott was owned by a military doctor who moved from a southern slave state to a northern free state. Scott sued for his freedom under the theory that because he was in a free state he should be free. The Supreme Court found that he was property and it didn't matter where his owner lived. Property has no rights and can not have standing in court.
Dred Scott v. Sanford, 60 US 393 (1857) Dred Scott lived in St. Louis, Missouri. For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The Supreme Court eventually decided to give Dred Scott his freedom. They made that decision because they thought that it would end the huge slavery crisis. A few weeks after Dred Scott was freed, he sadly died. :(
Dred Scott married a girl named Harriet
the dred scott decision stated that slaves are people also and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee<3
The Dred Scott decision was so controversial in the north becauseafrican americans would not have freedom or citizenship.