Researchers originally thought that protein was the genetic material because proteins had specific functions with great heterogeneity. Enzyme holds DNA strands apart because of a single stranded binding protein.
Even after DNA was discovered people thought that proteins were the genetic material, so it had little to do with the order of discovery. It boils down to variety: it was known that proteins were made from 20 different amino acids, while DNA is made of only four different bases. It kinda makes sense, then, that proteins could code for MUCH greater variety in their amino acid sequence than DNA could in its nucleotide sequence.
Keep in mind also that DNA replication, transcription, and translation were not known at this point. People knew what DNA was, but not what it could do.
The first solid evidence that it was DNA (and not protein) that confered heritable traits from generation to generation came when some very clever researchers laced one set of bacteria-invading viruses with radioactive sulfur, and another set with radioactive phosphorus. Viruses contain both proteins and nucleic acids, and it was known that viruses injected their genetic material into bacteria, whatever that genetic material might be. Since sulfur is found in proteins, but not nucleic acids, and phosphorus is found in nucleic adids, but not in proteins, it stood to reason that whichever radioisotope showed up inside the infected cells would betray the genetic material.
As it turns out, the viruses that carried radioactive sulfur didn't transfer that sulfur into their host cells, but radiophosphorus DID appear inside the cells infected by the other set of viruses. The conclusion was obvious: the viruses injected nucleic acids, and not proteins, into the cell when they hijacked the cell's genetic machinery.
As the experimental evidence mounted, the idea that proteins were the genetic material passed out of favor.
I know that's more than what you asked, but maybe it will help you in some way. Good luck!
Before the 1950's scientists believed that protein was the genetic material of the cell. Hope that helps.
most likely RNA
RNA
Proteins
DNA and Protein
Putative genetic material is a segment of DNA whose protein and function is not known, but it is believed to be a gene based on its open reading frame (part of the reading frame that contains no stop codons).
First off a prokaryotic organism is a thing that has no nucleus that holds it's genetic material. Viruses are prokaryotes. Their genetic material isn't in a nucleus. It has an inner core that holds its genetic material, and the inner core is protected by the virus's protein coat.
Hershey and Chase radioactively labelled T2 bacteriophage with P (DNA) and S (protein) to determine if protein or DNA carried the genetic material. They let the bacteriophage infect E.coli. The radioactive material found in the host E.coli contained the radioactive P (found in DNA) as the bacteriophage had multiplied inside the cell, but the radioactive S was not found inside the cell. Therefore DNA is the hereditary molecule resorce - some other guy off the internet
Due to bacterial transformation, bacteria may pick up genetic material present in the environment and incorporate this genetic material within a plasmid. The bacteria is able to make use of this genetic material, transcribe, translate and make what ever protein that is coded for
Inside the protein part... The genetic material is sorrounded by the protein :):)
genetic material is a cell that can be turn into a amino acid to a protein.
Protein was originally thought to be the genetic material because of its complexity, protein is made up 20 different amino acids while DNA only consists of four bases. This was logical as the complexity would account for diversity in organisms. But after more research was done it was realized that DNA was actually the genetic material.
Inside the protein part... The genetic material is sorrounded by the protein :):)
Viruses are bits of genetic material, either DNA or RNA, that are covered in a protein sheath.
The protein sequence.
scientists
Scientists thought genetic material was a protein not DNA because there are 20 different amino acids for a building of a protein polymer, while DNA polymers only have 4 nucleotide bases.
Protective protein coat
Virus
nucleic acids
Yes, eukaryotes have a nucleus which contains the genetic materials such as DNA and other protein complexes.