Scopes broke the law by teaching evolution.
Teaching evolution, as Scopes did, was against the law.
he broke the law for teaching evolution
he broke the law for teaching evolution
In 1925 the State of Tennessee accused substitute high school teacher John T. Scopes of violating state law by teaching human evolution in a state-funded school. The trial is known as the Scopes Trial or the Scopes Monkey Trial. Scopes was found guilty and fined $100. The verdict subsequently was overturned.
In 1925 the State of Tennessee accused substitute high school teacher John T. Scopes of violating state law by teaching human evolution in a state-funded school. The trial is known as the Scopes Trial or the Scopes Monkey Trial. Scopes was found guilty and fined $100. The verdict subsequently was overturned. The trial featured two famous attorneys. William Jennings Bryan argued for the prosecution. Clarence Darrow represented Scopes.
Scopes was convicted of teaching evolution.
he broke the law for teaching evolution
Convicted
John Thomas Scopes was a teacher in Dayton, Tennessee, who was charged on May 5, 1925 for violating Tennessee's Butler Act, which prohibited the teaching of evolution in Tennessee schools. He was tried in a case known as the Scopes Trial.
John Scopes
John T. Raulston was the judge in the Scopes trial.
In 1925, John Scopes, a high school science teacher, intentionally violated the State's Butler Act, which was a law put into effect to keep teachers from teaching about evolution in public schools. The trial was a publicity stunt.
scopes broke the law by teaching evolution.
he broke the law for teaching evolution
In 1925 the State of Tennessee accused substitute high school teacher John T. Scopes of violating state law by teaching human evolution in a state-funded school. The trial is known as the Scopes Trial or the Scopes Monkey Trial. Scopes was found guilty and fined $100. The verdict subsequently was overturned.
he broke the law for teaching evolution
The Scopes Trial, formally known as "The State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes" took place in Dayton, Tennessee.
In 1925 the State of Tennessee accused substitute high school teacher John T. Scopes of violating state law by teaching human evolution in a state-funded school. The trial is known as the Scopes Trial or the Scopes Monkey Trial. Scopes was found guilty and fined $100. The verdict subsequently was overturned. The trial featured two famous attorneys. William Jennings Bryan argued for the prosecution. Clarence Darrow represented Scopes.
Convicted
In 1925 the State of Tennessee accused substitute high school teacher John T. Scopes of violating state law by teaching human evolution in a state-funded school. The trial is known as the Scopes Trial or the Scopes Monkey Trial. Scopes was found guilty and fined $100. The verdict subsequently was overturned. The trial featured two famous attorneys. William Jennings Bryan argued for the prosecution. Clarence Darrow represented Scopes.
Dayton, Tennessee, USA
In the end, the jury convicted Scopes and fined him $100. In 1927 the Tennessee Supreme Court voided the fine, though not the conviction itself, on a technicality.
The Scopes trial refers to the "Scopes-Monkey" trial in which a high school Science teacher in Tennessee violated the Butler Act that made it unlawful to teach evolution in schools. He was found guilty.
The State of Tennessee v. John Scopes, (1925)Scopes went to trial immediately before the US Supreme Court began incorporating the First Amendment to the States in Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925). At the time Scopes' case was heard, there was no obligation on the part of Tennessee to abide by the First Amendment of the US Constitution.Scopes v. State, 154 Tenn. 105, (1927)The Tennessee Supreme Court affirmed the trial court's decision on appeal in Scopes v. State, (1927), and rejected Scopes' First Amendment argument on the grounds that Tennessee was permitted to regulate his speech in the classroom because he was an "employee of the state of Tennessee or of a municipal agency of the state" and under contract to work for an institution of the state. The Court held that Scopes' First Amendment rights were only abridged while performing an official service (teaching) for the state, but were untouched elsewhere.