What did you have for lunch. It makes much more sense than what did you had for lunch.
I had my lunch is the correct grammar
Both are correct, but it depends on whether this phrase is the subject of the sentence or the object: grandmother and I went to the park. They bought lunch for grandmother and me.
We did not take our lunch. We have not had our lunch. We have not taken lunch.
Both are correct with different meaning. I'm on lunchmeans either "I'm on my lunch-break" or "I'm the one taking care of the lunch-duty." I'm at lunch means simply means "I'm at lunch."
The correct way to say this would be "Mark HAD lunch." This means he already ate it. You could also say "Mark WILL HAVE lunch," meaning sometime in the future. Another correct sentence would be "Mark HAS lunch." This means that he is in possession of lunch but has not eaten it yet.
'In the hope that' is the correct phrase.
There is nothing actually incorrect about the phrase "lunch meal", and a rapid search will find a number of uses of the phrase. There is, however, no good reason for using it, as lunch is and has always been a meal. The phrase is redundant and not idiomatic. Use of this phrase might give the erroneous impression that the word "lunch" refers to a time of day, rather than a meal.
Both may be correct in different context. To have lunchmeans to eat a midday meal: We have lunch at noon every day. To have a lunch means to be in possession of midday foodstuffs: Joe has a lunch in his bag; or to provide a formal midday meal, usually for some official business: The Ladies' Aid Society will have a lunch on Saturday for the volunteers.
Both are correct, but it depends on whether this phrase is the subject of the sentence or the object: grandmother and I went to the park. They bought lunch for grandmother and me.
The correct form of invitation in "you are invited to lunch" or "you are invited at lunch" is "you are invited to lunch". You could also say, "you are invited to lunch at my house" as this would be grammatically correct.
for lunch
Breakfast and lunch were . . . "
All it needs is a question mark. Have you had lunch? That is grammatically correct.
We did not take our lunch. We have not had our lunch. We have not taken lunch.
Both are correct with different meaning. I'm on lunchmeans either "I'm on my lunch-break" or "I'm the one taking care of the lunch-duty." I'm at lunch means simply means "I'm at lunch."
The possessive form of the noun phrase 'the lunch of the student' is: the student's lunch.
The object of the preposition 'for' is lunch.
The correct way to say this would be "Mark HAD lunch." This means he already ate it. You could also say "Mark WILL HAVE lunch," meaning sometime in the future. Another correct sentence would be "Mark HAS lunch." This means that he is in possession of lunch but has not eaten it yet.