They both decrease genetic variation .
Aside from both being natural selection, not much. Let us use height in humans as our example.
Stabilizing selection, the regression to the mean, keeps the height of humans pretty much with a normal distribution as the human environment is the whole earth. So humans are not too tall, or too short, generally ( pygmies excluded ), over all the human range and various environments.
Now, with directional selection there would be a tendency for the human population to grow taller, or shorter over generations. We have seen this effect on humans in ancient times, Homo florensis, but in modern time stabilizing selection of human height, averaging out, is the norm.
They both decrease genetic variation.
They both reduce genetic variation
stabilizing selection
Stabilizing Selection-- The extremes are selected against.Example: height; mostly beings tend to the average height- not too many really short ones or really tall ones.Directional selection-- One extreme value is selected for.Example: speed; faster is always better so a population will tend to get faster over time.Disruptive selection-- The extremes are both selected for.This type of selection is not as common as the first two. Example: Prey-type animal with distinctive markings which the predators know will over time move away from the norm in both directions.
When natural selection favors the intermediate version of a characteristic, it is referred to as stabilizing selection. It is the opposite of disruptive selection.
Stabilizing selection
Stabilizing selection.
They both decrease genetic variation .
directional selection,stabilizing selection, anddisruptiveselection
They both decrease genetic variation .
Directional Selection - APEX
Directional selection
directional selection
Well, Directional Selections and Stabilizing selections are different because in Directional Selection, the frequency of a particular trait moves in one direction in a range, while in Stabilizing Selection, the distribution becomes narrower, tending to "stabilize" the average by increasing the proportion of similar individual. Also, I'm not sure about this but I think the continued gene flow tends to decrease the diversity between populations.
stabilizing selection
I'm not sure what "stabilizing directional" selection is, but if you get out a bell curve graph... Stabilizing selection tends to select for individuals around the average, or mean, of a population, which technically makes the curve steeper. Directional selection shifts the average in one direction (shifts the whole curve in one direction). Disruptive selection creates two new averages, which means it splits the one curve into two, smaller, separate curves.
Stabilizing Selection-- The extremes are selected against.Example: height; mostly beings tend to the average height- not too many really short ones or really tall ones.Directional selection-- One extreme value is selected for.Example: speed; faster is always better so a population will tend to get faster over time.Disruptive selection-- The extremes are both selected for.This type of selection is not as common as the first two. Example: Prey-type animal with distinctive markings which the predators know will over time move away from the norm in both directions.
They both decrease genetic variation
A common cause of stabilizing selection Heterozygotes are fittest.