0
What doctrine requires courts to follow authoritative prior decisions when ruling on a case?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
This legal doctrine is known as stare decisis, a latin term which means to stand by decisions and not disturb the undisturbed. A prior judicial decision is commonly referred to as a precedent.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is stare decisis the doctrine that requires lower courts to adhere to existing case law in their decisions true or false?
true
What doctrine requires lower courts to follow established laws?
you have business/consumer law class too? haha
Stare Decisis is the doctrine of?
Stare decisis is a doctrine that states that courts need to abide by past controlling judicial decisions. For example, a circuit court is bound by Supreme Court holdings.
What doctrine requires lower courts to follow established case laws?
you have business/consumer law class too? haha
Disadvantages of stare decisis?
Stare decisis is the legal doctrine of deferring to the judgment of past courts. This is often called "precedent." The disadvantage is that it makes the law inflexible, and can prevent courts from correcting poor decisions. It also causes them to repeat the mistakes of past courts.
The doctrine of stare decisis binds judges to follow the prior decisions of?
The doctrine of stare decisis binds judges to follow precedents set by higher appellate courts under which jurisdiction the particular lower court falls.For example, in the federal court system US Supreme Court decisions create binding precedents for all US District Courts and US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts; however, Circuit Court decisions only set binding precedents for the US District Courts within their territorial jurisdiction.The exception to this is decisions of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has nationwide jurisdiction (below that of the Supreme Court) over special subject-matter cases.
The tier of state courts that reviews decisions of trial courts is called?
Appellate Courts
About 1 4 th of the supreme courts decisions concern appeals from?
About 1 4 th of the supreme courts decisions concern appeals from District Courts
What is the doctrine of precedent that states the decisions of other courts which are not binding on a judge?
There is no doctrine of non-binding precedents. Non-binding opinions that may be used as guidelines for deciding future cases are called persuasive precedents. Binding precedents are upheld under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand).
What is the name for a Supreme Court decisions that will be used to decide future cases?
US Supreme Court opinions (decisions) set binding precedents because all lower courts are required to follow the same reasoning when deciding similar cases under the doctrine of stare decisis (Latin: Let the decision stand).
Which court can repeal decisions made in federal district courts?
U.S. courts of appealThe actual answer to your question is none. No-one repeals decision of any courts. However, decisions of courts can be reversed. The Federal Courts of Appeals can reverse decisions of federal district courts. That's it.Added: And the US Supreme Court can over-rule the decision of ANY inferior court.
Is the principle of stare decisis irrelevant to the hierarchy of courts making decisions?
No. Stare decisis binds lower courts to decisions of higher appellate courts. Strict hierarchical rules apply.
