There is one question that involves Senator Sanders that has seemed to slip under the radar scope of the news media and among other politicians that either support Senator Sanders or that oppose him. Clearly the "main stream" of the Democrat Party leans more towards the policies of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton then those of Senator Sanders. Also, on the Republican side, liberal, moderate and conservative politicians also are on opposite poles then Senator Sanders.
With all that said, how can Senator Sanders refer to himself as a socialist? Socialists believe that the major means of production in a democratic socialist nation are owned and controlled by the central government under the name of all the people. Senator Sanders has not proposed one area of the US mixed market economy that he would socialize. With that said, it can be generous to say that the senator "prefers socialism" however, he recognizes that:
1. Very few people in the US are socialists; and
2. No one in either of the major political party has proposed a government takeover of the banking system as an example, simply as a measure to improve the economy and does not claim that such a move would be part of a socialist agenda.
Senator Sanders, if he were to be elected to the US presidency would be an advocate of increased social expenditures, such as reduced college fees or free college. This measure would never pass Congress.
Senator Sanders believes that increased social programs would be paid for by raising taxes.
Yet as it has been pointed out time and time again, that if all the wealth of the top 5% of Americans, would be confiscated to help pay for new programs or to reduce the national debt, this would amount to nothing. Raising it to the top 10% would also not make a dent in the national debt of about $20 trillion.
With all of that said, the answer to the original question is that if Senator Sanders was elected to the US presidency, he would be an advocate of increased taxes and more social benefits.
There is nothing wrong with that "idea" except that it most likely is not workable.
Of course, it is doubtful that Bernie Sanders will actually be elected and, even assuming he is elected, the fidelity with which he may be able to realize his policies is questionable. However, be that as it may, he has outlined many of his political policies on his website: Issues - Bernie Sanders.
Bernie Sanders lost the Democratic nomination for the 2016 US Presidential run to Hillary Rodham Clinton. He was not selected to be Mrs. Clinton's running mate, but is said to have influenced the Democratic platform, but not the upcoming newly elected President.
WHAT IS McCAIN GOING TO DO ABOUT HEALTH CARE INSURANCE??
i havent heard anything yet like what he want to change obama want to change immigration
Almost certainly not. Hillary Clinton seems at this point to have the Democratic nomination sewed up. If something should happen to her, Bernie Sanders is still a very unlikely possibility. His views are too extreme for him to be elected and the Democrats want to win.
I am not quite sure what you want to know. The president and vice president are elected as a team at the same time and their terms expire at the same time. If the president leaves office before the end of his term, the vice-president becomes president.
the answer is Jon Stewart
Jon Stewart
They pass a bill to raise taxes which becomes law if the Senate also passes it and the president signs it.
The bill automatically becomes a law.
I am not sure what you want to know. Presidents are paid a good salary. I think all of them had more money when they left the White House than when they went in. Presidents do not have to do anything special with their money.
the truth
yes you can fund the infernus without bernie having given it to you but wether or not its easier... but if you want to look around look in the "times square" i have seen it there one or twice
he truly doesnt want to run for president