0
What does it mean if a scientist fails to rejects a hypothesis?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
Christian Sawayn
Casimir Keebler
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
Waldo Mayer
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
Joany Funk
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThere is not sufficient evidence to reject an hypothesis so the null hypothesis stands.
Wiki User
∙ 8y agothe hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does it mean when a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
What do you mean when you reject a hypothesis on the basis of sample?
alternitive hypothesis
What does hypothesis mean science terms?
HYPOTHESIS: a hypothesis is what you think will happen. You should try starting it off with my hypothesis is... next it will.... then it will... finally it will...
In a two-way ANOVA you can test main hypothesis and one interactive hypothesis?
Not sure about an interactive hypothesis: are you sure you don't mean alternative hypothesis?
What does state whether your hypothesis was correct or not mean?
It means tell them how your hypothesis was right or not.
What does it mean when a scientist rejects a hypothesis?
It means that he or she does not find the hypothesis to be plausible.
What does it mean when a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means that the experiment is consistent with the hypothesis. It adds to the credibility of the hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What does it mean if a scientist can't reject a hypothesis?
It means that she or he has to accept that the existing hypothesis appears to be true.
What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What dose it mean if a scientist fail to reject a hypothesis?
It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.
What does it mean for scientist to reject a hypothesis?
That he either found it to be incorrect or heard from a majority of other scientists working in the same field of study that the hypothesis isn't true. Though it's almost always the first one I said.
Why are two most important factors that a scientist should consider when attempting to publish a paper in a specific journal?
Do you mean "what are"? If so, I would think hypothesis and conclusion...
Why is a hypothesis that is unsupported by observation rejected by scientists?
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
What is directional research hypothesis?
A hypothesis in which the scientist predicts the direction of difference within two things being studied. Ex: Apples are juicier than pears. Not directional: There is a difference in the amount of juice between apples and pears. This is not directional because the scientist does not predict which fruit is juicier, only that they are not the same.
What is it mean when a hypothesis is accepted?
This means the data supported the hypothesis.
What do you mean when you reject a hypothesis on the basis of sample?
alternitive hypothesis
