answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.

User Avatar

Caroline Cronin

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What does mean when a supreme court justice issues a dissenting opinion?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

. What does it mean when a Supreme Court justice issues a dissenting opinion?

When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.


What does it mean when a Supreme Court issues a dissenting opinion?

When a Supreme Court "dissents" it is disagreeing with the majority opinion.


Does the American Bar Association help select a US Supreme Court justice?

The American Bar Association issues an opinion about the professional competence and qualifications of US Supreme Court nominees and potential nominees.


Who issues the oath of office?

A justice of the Supreme Court issues the Oath of Office on Inauguration Day.


The a Supreme Court issues a what when a case relates to the interpretation of law?

Opinion


Who issues the Presidential Oath of Office on inauguration day?

A Justice of the Supreme Court.


What is the US Supreme Court's process when releasing decisions?

The US Supreme Court releases decisions at the end of each term, typically from October to June. After oral arguments, justices privately discuss and vote on the case. The opinion writing process begins with the assignment of a justice to write the majority opinion, followed by dissenting and concurring opinions. Once the opinions are finalized, they are released to the public.


Should a person's opinion on the controversial issue of the day be a factor in his selection as a Supreme Court justice?

A Justice on the Supreme Court, or any court for that matter, has the responsibility to make decisions that are consistant with the Consitution and the Bill of Rights of the United States. Many controversial issues of the day actually do revolve around this very central matter of Constitutionality. Thus, it is possible to make judgments upon an individual nomination based upon this opinion.


What are the steps in deciding major supreme court cases?

Someone petitions the Supreme Court to review a case on appealThe lawyers submit briefsThe justices vote to decide which cases to hearThe Clerk schedules oral argumentsThe justices read all briefs and lower court documentsThe justices have their clerks research precedents and other informationThe justices listen to oral argumentsThe justices hold a case conference to discuss issues and take a voteOne justice is assigned to write the official opinion of the CourtThe opinion is circulated for commentsOther justices write concurring or dissenting opinions (optional)The decision is released to the parties and the general public


Who was the Chief of Justice of the supreme Court that disagreed with Jefferson about many political issues?

The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court who disagreed with Jefferson on many political issues was John Marshall. Marshall was appointed by President John Adams and served as Chief Justice from 1801 to 1835. He is known for significantly strengthening the powers of the federal government and establishing the principle of judicial review.


What types of opinions does the supreme court issue?

Written OpinionsThe four most common opinions:MajorityConcurringDissentingPer CuriamThe Court's Opinion (usually also the majority opinion) is synonymous with the Court's decision. The "Opinion of the Court" gives the verdict and explains the reasoning behind the decision reached. The privilege of writing the official opinion falls to the most senior justice in the majority group, or to the Chief Justice if he voted with the majority; this person may choose to write the opinion, or may assign the task to another member of the majority. If the justices who voted against the majority wish to issue a unified opinion, they simply decide amongst themselves who will write it.Individual justices may write their own opinions, usually concurring or dissenting, regardless of whether they agree with the majority. Justices may also "join" or sign any other written opinion they agree with, even if they agree with more than one point-of-view. This generally strengthens the opinion.All published opinions except Per Curiam decisions may be used as precedent in future litigation.Opinion of the Court - The official opinion, whether unanimous or by majority voteMajority opinion - Also called the "Opinion of the Court," this is the official verdict in the case that represents the vote of the majority of justicesPlurality opinion - A concurring opinion joined by more justices than the official Court opinionDissenting opinion - An opinion written by a justice who disagrees with the majorityDissenting in part - An opinion written by a justice who voted with the majority on the decision, but disagrees with a portion of the reasoning in the majority opinion, which he or she explains in writingUnanimous opinion - An opinion authored by one justice, often (but not always) the Chief Justice, and signed by all justicesConcurring opinion - An opinion that agrees with the decision but may disagree with the some of the reasoning behind the Court opinion, or may elaborate on a point made or introduce further relevant informationConcurring in part - Typically an opinion written by a justice who voted against the majority, but agrees with a portion of the majority opinion, which he or she explains in writingConcurring in judgment - An opinion written by a justice who agrees with the decision, but not with the reasoning used to reach the decisionConcurring in part and dissenting in part - An opinion written by a justice who may have voted either way, but wants to explain which points are in agreement and which are in disagreement.Per Curiam opinion: The opinion is given by the full court, unsigned by the JusticesSeriatim opinion: Each justice on the Court writes his or her own, separate opinion; there is no majority opinion, only a majority verdict. This type of opinion was more common in the 18th, and parts of the 19th, centuriesThe most important type is the majority opinion. The majority opinion is, as the name suggests, the opinion of the majority of judges hearing the case. In most cases, a majority opinion requires five Justices, unless one or more Justices have recused themselves from a given decision. The majority opinion is important because it defines the precedent that all future courts hearing a similar case should follow.Majority opinions are sometimes accompanied by concurring opinions. Concurring opinions are written by individual Justices in the majority. These opinions agree with the majority opinion, but may stress a different point of law. Sometimes, concurring opinions will agree with the result reached by the majority, but for a different reason altogether.Opinions written by justices not in the majority are known as dissenting opinions. Dissenting opinions are important because they provide insight into how the Court reached its decision.Sometimes the court issues so many separate opinions that whichever opinion is joined by the most justices is referred to as a plurality, rather than a majority. One recent example of a decision holding a plurality opinion is that of Baez et al., v. Rees (2008), where Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy and Alito signed one opinion, and Justice Stevens wrote a separate concurring opinion, as did Justices Scalia, Breyer, and Thomas (Scalia also joined Thomas' concurrence). Justice Ginsberg wrote a dissenting opinion in which Justice Souter joined.There are also a number of cases where members of the majority each wrote a concurring opinion, without creating a unified majority or plurality opinion, as well as cases where the court decision was released without the signature of any justice, in an anonymous fashion. This latter form is known as a per curiam decision. Bush v. Gore (2000) is a recent example. Cases decided per curiam do not create a precedent that can be cited in future litigation.Plurality and per curiam decisions tend to create confusion as to how a federal or constitutional law is to be interpreted.


Who was the author of decision in the plessy v Ferguson case?

Chief Justice Earl Warren wrote the unanimous opinion of the Court in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, (1954). The Supreme Court only issues majority and dissenting opinions in cases where the Court is split. In Brown, all nine Justices supported the verdict, but none wrote concurring opinions.Case Citation:Brown v. Board of Education, 347 US 483 (1954)For more information, see Related Questions, below.