answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Jehovah's Witnesses do not refuse medical intervention. We seek the highest quality medical care available for ourselves and our loved ones. The only treatment we refuse is that involving transfusions of whole blood or its major componants into our bodies. This is based on Acts 15:28, 29 and other related passages in the Holy Bible. Although our refusal is Bible based, we have benefitted physically from this stand as well. Our surgeons are thus more careful, and we often recover more quickly from surgery than others who have the same surgery with blood transfusions. Many who are not Witnesses have also benefitted from our stand. Link below to more details.

Jehovah's Witnesses do not refuse medical intervention. We seek the highest quality medical care available for ourselves and our loved ones. The only treatment we refuse is that involving transfusions of whole blood or its major componants into our bodies. This is based on Acts 15:28, 29 and other related passages in the Holy Bible. Although our refusal is Bible based, we have benefitted physically from this stand as well. Our surgeons are thus more careful, and we often recover more quickly from surgery than others who have the same surgery with blood transfusions. Many who are not Witnesses have also benefitted from our stand. Link below to more details.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

When the apsotles were deciding what commands of the mosaic law should still be kept by Christians, in Acts 15:28,29 they included "abstain from blood". Jehovah's Witnesses consider blood transfusions a violation of this requirement.

ANSWER BY ONE OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES...

When you look at The Bible, the second half or the Christian,Greek Scriptures we must know that it was penned for the people in the last days, we are said people, now in the for told last days.

With this in mind just think about that Scripture in the Book of Acts, the key word is ABSTAIN. No this means not to do or to stop doing some thing, I.E taking Blood into our bodies one way or the other so you can see that this is not just talking about the eating of Blood but the taking in of Blood into the body as a whole.

With this in mind, I personally DO NOT accept whole Blood or ANY of the fractions that can be made from whole Blood. I also refuse any and ALL medication that was derived or has Blood or Blood fractions within it.

I hope that this helps you in some small way...

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Well what I heard is that they do take medical treatment, they just dont take blood. If you wanted the answer to that, a doctor told me it was because taking blood is unheathy, and so Jehovah's Witnesses refuse to take it.

Jehovah's Witnesses don't accept blood primarily based on what the Bible says about not drinking or eating blood. They view taking it in by transfusion to be "eating" blood, like an IV fluid might be nourishment. They will take several blood alternatives though - volume expanders, and make arrangements before surgery to use blood conservation such as a cell savage machine. There are several hospitals that specialize in all kinds of surgery without blood transfusions for patients of any religion so this does not pose much of a medical problem for Jehovahs Witnesses.

Otherwise, Jehovah's Witnesses are not restricted in what medical treatment they take and what they will do medically is up to them individually.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

There is a command in the book of Acts to abstain from blood. JWs follow the bible in all aspects and so they reject blood.

The Holy Bible says that you should abstain from blood. This is in reference to satanic rituals where animal blood was drank. There is nothing that says medical use of blood is restricted.

If we didn't progress with the times we would all be using horse and carts.

The claims that there are blood substitutes is also wrong. These so called substitutes do not and cannot perform the task of real blood.

The Bible says you shall not kill. Isn't letting someone die because of refusing blood akin to killing?
WHY? I think because the 'faithful and discreet slave' class (in practical terms the seven members of the Governing Body), tell individual Witnesses not to, based on their understanding of Acts 15 saying 'abstain from blood'. Therefore, Witnesses believe they are obeying Jesus' direct commands as explained in their journal the Watchtower 1st May 1959 p269 "To hold to the headship of Christ, it is therefore necessary to obey the organization that he is personally directing. Doing what the organization says is to do what he says. Resisting the organization is to resist him.''

If the Society's Governing Body had 'new light' and said that Witnesses could have blood transfusions then many probably would. This is demonstrated in their beliefs on organ transplants. At one time they used to refuse organ transplants as they were considered by the 'discreet slave' class to be cannibalism. (Watchtower 15th Nov 1967). Then in 1980 15th March Watchtower they saw fit to direct Witnesses that it was now ok to take organ transplants.

Also to be precise, they do accept transfusions of blood fractions, all of them, but not all at the same time as then they would be back to transfusing blood.

The prohibition in taking blood into a human body through eating was one of only a few laws that were carried forward from the Levitical laws God gave to the nation of Israel. ('You must not eat the blood of any sort of flesh, because the soul of every sort of flesh is its blood. Anyone eating it will be cut off.'"-Leviticus 17:13, 14). The laws of the Mosaic covenant were sometimes for dietary and sanitation purposes but many, like this one on misuse of blood, also impressed upon the nation the sanctity of life, as represented by blood. When the Jews debated what laws the Christian congregation required them to keep the older men in Jerusalem (including apostles) stated clearly in Acts "KEEP abstaining . . . from blood." (Acts 15:29). Perhaps the Jews could have reasoned at times that they needed it to survive, like neighboring nations but God's law prohibited it under threat of death for disobedience.

Today Jehovah's Witnesses have been protected from serious illness and death by complications, blood type errors and blood-borne disease by insisting on SAFE alternatives. It is now common practice at most hospitals to administer blood alternatives in an effort to minimize risk. As always, the Creator of the universe has divine wisdom that can benefit us if we listen and obey. (Isaiah 48:17) "This is what Jehovah has said, your Repurchaser, the Holy One of Israel: "I, Jehovah, am your God, the One teaching you to benefit [yourself], the One causing you to tread in the way in which you should walk."

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

In Act 15:29, the bible says," to keep abstainingfrom things sacrificed to idols and from blood and from things strangled and from fornication."

Jehovah's Witnesses, by refusing blood transfusions, are simply following god's word in the bible. Ask a witness for more information and literature on the subject for a further explanation. They are happy to help!

There is a website in the link below where you will find a lot of information on up to date medical technology that eliminates all of the complications of injecting foreign blood into your body. JW's aren't by far the only people that know the unnecessary dangers associated with blood transfusions.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

In Acts 15:29 it say that we should abstain from blood. Jehovah's Witnesses understand this to mean that blood should not be used in any form which includes eating it and/or transfusing it. It is a command from Jehovah found in the bible. There are also many forms of treatments that can be used without subjecting to the dangerous use of blood for health purposes.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

Witnesses believe that Acts 15 ''abstain from blood'' means to not have a transfusion.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why will Jehovah's Witnesses not receive blood tranfusions?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are some movies about the Jehovahs Witnesses and their controversial Blood doctrines?

I would recommend the video "No Blood - Medicine Meets the Challenge". Ask any of Jehovah's Witnesses to get it for you when they call at your door.


What did Charles Drew do to get recognized?

Charles Drew expanded the knowledge of blood banking and blood tranfusions.


What did Charles Drew do for society?

Charles Drew expanded the knowledge of blood banking and blood tranfusions.


How did Charles Drew help others?

Charles Drew expanded the knowledge in the Blood Banking and blood tranfusions.


When hospitalized are there any special procedures for Jehovahs witnesses?

Jehovah's Witenesses do not receive blood transfusions, for religious reasons. Depending therefore, on the reason for their hospitalization, various nonblood fluids volume expanders might be adminitstered when one might otherwise have been given blood. Other than that, Jehovah's witnesses, would expect the same level of care, consultation rights and legal protection as any other patient when in hospital.


Who were Charles Richard Drew?

Charles Drew was a medical doctor that expanded the knowledge of blood banking and blood tranfusions.


How was dr Charles Drew importanat?

Charles Drew helped expand the knowledge of blood banking and blood tranfusions.


Why does jehovas don't take blood transfusion?

"Jehovah's Witnesses" is what we are called. And we believe blood is sacred and should not be given away. However, some Jehovah's Witnesses do give and receive blood. It is a moral problem.


Which group does not allow blood transfusions because they believe that taking blood into the body is morally wrong?

The group is know as "Jehovah's Witnesses". They believe that receiving blood transfusions are the same as drinking blood, which is stickily forbidden in the old testament law and repeated in the new testament book of Acts where Gentile believers were to "they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication." The problem comes down to whither or not transfusions are drinking blood or not.


How was it scriptural for the Watchtower to allow blood transfusions for Bulgarian Jehovahs Witnesses in 1998 after signing a contract with Bulgaria before the European Commission for Human Rights?

I believe that you have been misinformed. Please, consider your source before making false accusations on the Witnesses. There is no answer to your question.


Why do Jehovah's disallow blood tranfusions?

We follow the command at Acts 15:29, which is to abstain from blood. That means we avoid consuming or taking in any blood to our bodies.


What is the difference between a spoken language difference and a cultural difference?

A spoken language difference is simply when you and another person (say, a patient) do not speak the same language. A cultural difference is where something that is accepted in your culture is not acceptable in another (blood tranfusions are not accepted by Jehovah's Witnesses, for example).