The number of links in a food chain is ultimately limited by the amount of energy in the producers of the particular ecosystem.
The number of links in a food chain is ultimately limited by the amount of energy in the producers of the particular ecosystem
5
It depends on the length of the chain and the size of the links. A chain as a unit of measure is 66 feet long. Four rods equals one chain. A link is 0.04 rod, or 7.92 inches. There are 100 links in a chain.
Energy that can be transfered to the next level
Presumably, each link in a food chain consists of one species on Earth. The number of species in nature can not exceed the number of creatures of all species. Assume that each creature requires some finite, non-zero volume of space on Earth; therefore, there is a minimum volume that all creatures each requires. An infinite number of creatures would occupy infinite space. Earth has not infinite space, albeit it seems very large to finite creatures like you and me. Therefore, no food chain on Earth can have infinite links.
The links between the energy that carnivores get from eating each other are butts.
???????????????ughhhh
5
It depends on the length of the chain and the size of the links. A chain as a unit of measure is 66 feet long. Four rods equals one chain. A link is 0.04 rod, or 7.92 inches. There are 100 links in a chain.
the monarch butterfly is one of the first links of the food chain.
5
There cannot be too many links in a food chain. Food chains always begin with a plant and end with an animal. If there are more than 4 or 5 links in the chain , there will not be enough food for the animals at the end of the chain.
Yes. See the Related Links for more information.
Energy that can be transfered to the next level
The lowest organism on a food chain is the primary producer which occupies the first trophic level
Yes, well put. Your question identifies two links in the food chain.
Carnivore or Omnivores are found in both.
If the number of phytoplankton decrease the food chain would decrease in the ocean.