answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

economics, intellectual thought, religion, and military

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What factors did the europeans used to justify their conquest of africa?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

How did Europeans justify taking people from Africa and making them slaves?

it was a chance for the slaves to become catholics.


What factors prevented europeans prior to 1860 from exploring the Africa interior?

Resistance by Africa,difficult geography and diseases kept Europeans from moving into the interior of Africa.


What were internal factors that contributed to imperialism in Africa?

The Europeans tachnology was supperior, also the Europeans used steam engins to travel faster throughout Africa.


From the African view in 19th century europeans countries claimed that the conquest of Africa would bring what?

Loss of political independence.


What were 2 factors within Africa that made it vulnerable to European conquest during the age of imperialism?

Factors;1) Europeans' technological superiority: Their 2_factors_within_Africa_that_made_it_vulnerable_to_European_conquestconsisted of the Maxim gun (invented in 1884), by which was the world's first ever known automatic machine gun. European countries immediately attained the Maxim, while the repelling Africans were obligated to depend on old fashioned weapons.2) Europeans had the eligibility to keep control over their empire: Steam engines permitted them (Europeans) to effortlessly travel on bodies of water to institute bases of control deep in the African continent.


When did Umayyad conquest of North Africa happen?

Umayyad conquest of North Africa happened in 647.


2 factors within Africa that made it vulnerable to European conquest?

Factors;1) Europeans' technological superiority: Their technology consisted of the Maxim gun (invented in 1884), by which was the world's first ever known automatic machine gun. European countries immediately attained the Maxim, while the repelling Africans were obligated to depend on old fashioned weapons.2) Europeans had the eligibility to keep control over their empire: Steam engines permitted them (Europeans) to effortlessly travel on bodies of water to institute bases of control deep in the African continent.WRONG DONT listen1884!! My guess is your talking around about 1400's about when it became 1884 africa was all ready conquered. I Say1) Africa was not a single nation,tribes were already split and feuding,while Europeans had a huge nation, a game of numbers.2)The gun, and Arab intervention 2v1 during those times it was Arab imperialism.3) lying and cheating, Europeans in history never directly attacked a country. it always started as peaceful means of giving civilization( of course a lie). Think Avatar.The two factors within Africa that made it vulnerable to European conquest included permittivity, and illiteracy.


What is African Colonial historiography?

The writing of African History by non Africans especially the Europeans during the period of colonial domination is what is referred to as Colonial historiography. This was pioneered by explorers, Christian Missionaries, travelers, anthropologists and ethnographers. Most of the writings of these people were euro-centric, written in the European perspective and in most cases to justify European imposition of colonial rule. All kinds of devices were used to justify their claim over Africa including scientific explanations such as the Hamitic hypothesis. The euro-centric views emphasized European racial superiority to justify imperialist activities of Europeans in Africa. The African perspective was completely left out. In that respect the claim was made that history began only when men began to write. And since Africa had no written records before the advent of Europeans, Africa had no history before that time. And even during colonialism or its preceding years of trade, the history of Africa is equated with the activities of Europeans in Africa. This however has been debunked by African historians who have shown from both written (Arabic and Moslem sources) and oral sources that Africa indeed had a history before and during colonial period outside of their relation with Europeans.


What factors were not present in Africa or the Americas to foster expansion into the Atlantic basin from those areas?

there were several reasons that hindered the expantion of Europeans


How did Europeans get their information about Africa?

They explored Africa.


How did southern africa become a battleground for various groups?

Southern Africa became fought over for many reasons. Some African groups, Zulu and Matabele and others were establishing their empires and pushing away smaller African tribes. Some Europeans were coming into Africa to farm and settle, other Europeans were coming into Africa to exploit Natural Resources. -All of these factors led to conflict.


Where did Europeans get their slaves?

africa