Wiki User
∙ 10y agoBe notified when an answer is posted
Cases from its appellate jurisdiction.
No
he was a judge for the supreme court in separate but equal.
No. Only the tiniest fraction of American judicial policy is made by the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court decided that the state governments could legally separate people of different races as long as the separate facilities were equal.
1954
The supreme court in plessy v fergussion based on a theory that separate can be equal but in reality it's not
the supreme court justices
The Supreme Court passed Brown v. The Board of Education in 1954; this case was pivotal in ending the 'separate, but equal' doctrine that had perpetuated segregation. It illuminated the fact that separate was inherently not equal.
1954 . Separate but equal wasn't a law, but an method used in Jim Crow to keep people separated and unequal.Thurgood Marshal was the lawyer for the plaintiffs. He argued that the system of racial separation, while masquerading as providing separate but equal treatment of both white and black Americans, instead it perpetuated inferior accommodation, services, and treatment for black Americans. The suit called for the Topeka school district to reverse its policy of racial segregation. The Supreme Court used the 14th amendments equal protection clause to determine the operation of separate public schools for white and black students.
Separate but equal
it legalized separate but equal