answersLogoWhite

Top Answer
User Avatar
Wiki User
Answered 2014-06-05 13:06:11

A writ of certiorari is an order that allows the Supreme Court to review lower court cases. This writ is not limited to the Supreme Court, it may be used by any appellate court needing to review a case.

001
๐Ÿ™
0
๐Ÿคจ
0
๐Ÿ˜ฎ
0
๐Ÿ˜‚
0
User Avatar

Your Answer

Related Questions


When the US Supreme Court issues a writ of certiorari (an order to the lower court to send up records), it indicates they have agreed to review the case under their appellate jurisdiction.


No. Judicial review was established by the Supreme Court decision in Marbury v. Madison


Only reverse this decision. that is called judicial review.


The US Supreme Court is the final arbiter of the Constitution, so its role in judicial review is that of making the ultimate decision about what is, and is not, constitutional.


The effect of the Supreme Court's decision on Marbury v Madison is that it is now viewed as the classic expression of judicial review.


The US Supreme Court reviews appeals of cases involving federal questions, meaning issues of federal or constitutional law or US treaties. It also considers cases involving disputes between the states under its original jurisdiction.A Supreme Court review is simply an appeal of a lower court decision that the Court has agreed to accept and render a final judgment.





Marbury v. Madison established the concept of judicial review. Judicial review is the right of the Supreme Court to declare a law constitutional or not.



Yes. Miranda was convicted at his second trial, and the decision was affirmed by the Arizona Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court denied certiorari to review the second trial in 1969, leaving the decision of the Arizona Supreme Court controlling.


The US Supreme Court issues a writ of certiorari, or an order to the court from which the case is being appealed, to send the case records to the Supreme Court.In reality, the Supreme Court no longer issues a formal writ after granting certiorari; requesting files is now an administrative procedure handled by the Clerk of Court as a matter of routine.


John Marshall's decision helped the national gov't because it established Judicial Review which is when the Supreme Court rules a law unconstitutional.


Supreme Court Review was created in 1960.


The main duties of the Supreme Court justices are:Hear important casesReview briefs and discussVote and then issue a decision


Marbury vs Madison established the principle of "judicial review."Judicial review says the Supreme Court can decide on whether laws passed by Congress and signed by the President are constitutional.


ALL lower courts, both state and federal, can be reviewed by the Supreme Court. Every court in the nation is subordinate to the US Supreme Court.


The Supreme Court's decision refers the case back to the lower court that must review the case and change the ruling. I hope this helps!



who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case


Certain cases are important enough to require the authoritative decision of the nation's highest court rather than being decided by a lower court. If issues of constitutional interpretation are involved, that is the specialty of the Supreme Court.


It didn't. Judicial review is the US Supreme Court's greatest power.


The supreme court has the power of judicial review. The power of judicial review of the supreme court has the power to overturn legislation when it is deemed unconstitutional.


AnswerDeclare acts of the supreme court unconstitutional.AnswerNo, they can't. The US Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of constitutionality; Congress has no authority to override their decisions or to formally declare a decision unconstitutional. Congress has two possible responses to a decision they disagree with:They can initiate an Amendment to the Constitution that, if passed by two-thirds of the House and Senate and ratified by the three-quarters of the states, can override a Supreme Court decision;They can rewrite legislation to bypass bring an Act or law into compliance with the justices' decision; or,They can wait and hope a future Supreme Court will reverse the decision itself.These are the only options.



Copyright ยฉ 2021 Multiply Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.