They are the same thing. Every machine type has its own version of machine code, the native language of the machine (native machine code). All high-level code must be converted to native machine code before it can execute. Machine code is machine dependent but high-level code is generally machine-independent, thus the same source code can generally be converted to suit any type of machine using a suitable compiler or interpreter.
Machine code is machine-dependant because every machine architecture has its own version of machine code. The code is non-portable because only the machine for which the code was intended will be able to understand it.
computer's C.P.U run machine code and does not understand the source code and compiler translate the source code into machine code.
The computer's CPU run machine code and does not understand source code. The compiler is used translate the source code to machine code.
Machine language is also known as machine code or native code.
enigma was the German code making machine not code breaking ultra was the code breaking machine
Java byte code is the code that is output by the Java compiler. Byte code is not machine code, it must be interpreted to create the machine code. This is handled by the Java virtual machine. Pretty much every platform produced today has a Java virtual machine implementation, so the same byte code can be executed upon any machine. Byte code can be regarded as being the native language of the virtual machine, as opposed to machine code which is the native language of the physical machine.
Machine code is the ONLY example of machine language. However, every machine architecture has its own version of machine code; it is the native language of the machine. If you want to examine machine code upon your own machine, use a hex editor. This will show you every byte of the code in hexadecimal form.
object code is a code which is generated after translation from source code.This object might be machine code or require some linker to make it machine code. Moreover object code could be machine independent or machine dependent code. If its machine independent like in java byte code which is object code then it can then be transported to some other platform. But if it is machine dependent then it cannot be transferred to other location or else it will not execute. http:\\in-central.blogspot.com
which program is used to translate source code into machine code
Compiled code is plain-text source code that is translated from an English-like, high-level language into either machine code or byte code by a program known as a compiler. Machine code is the native language of the machine, consisting of binary patterns that represent a sequence of machine instructions and their operands. Byte code is the native language of a virtual machine; a machine that only exists within a computer's memory. The virtual machine is simply a program that interprets the byte code in order to produce the actual machine code. Unlike machine code which must be compiled separately for each platform, byte code will run on any platform that has a corresponding virtual machine implementation.
Generally, "machine code" refers to the data that can be executed by a certain computer, while "bytecode" refers to data that can be executed by a virtual machine. The virtual machine takes the bytecode and produces machine code appropriate for the actual machine it is running on.
The computer doesn't directly understand the source code; it understands machine code. The compiler's role is to translate the source code (readable by humans) into machine code (readable by the CPU).The computer doesn't directly understand the source code; it understands machine code. The compiler's role is to translate the source code (readable by humans) into machine code (readable by the CPU).The computer doesn't directly understand the source code; it understands machine code. The compiler's role is to translate the source code (readable by humans) into machine code (readable by the CPU).The computer doesn't directly understand the source code; it understands machine code. The compiler's role is to translate the source code (readable by humans) into machine code (readable by the CPU).
There is no difference between machine code and native code. They are one the same thing.
Because machine code only understsnd by computer in form of 0,1 and byte code not machine code and store in .class of java library it is at the 2nd stage of conversion and the machine code at the final stage and end stage so byte code under stand by any machine by the java library not convert into machine code i.e understand by machine kuldeep singh ssimt
the code for the code machine is bunty
Machine code, assembly language, COBOL, FORTRAN and C. Machine code is the only language that is native to the machine. All others must be converted to machine code.
native code is machine code each machine has its won set of istruction one machine's native code won't run on another While bytecode is what java produces and it can run on any machine. when we run bytecode it first get to compile to machine code and then get to run.
Compliers are used to convert C++ into assembly code. Then a tool called an "assembler" converts that code into machine code. Finally, a "linker" connects all of those machine code files into a single executable.
Is called machine code
There isn't a code for a vending machine.
A compiled program is source code that is translated to either machine code (native code) or byte code. Native machine code requires no further translation and can be executed as-is, but byte code must be interpreted in order to produce the required machine code. Java is an example of a language that compiles to byte code that is suitable for interpretation by the Java virtual machine. C++, on the other hand, compiles to native machine code. Interpretation is much slower than executing native machine code program, however it is more efficient to interpret compiled byte code than it is to interpret high-level source code. Moreover, byte code is generally portable whereas native machine code is always machine-dependent.
Computers only understand machine code. Low-level Assembler language and all high-level languages must be assembled or compiled to machine code in order to execute. However, the computer itself can be programmed (with a machine-code program) to generate the required machine code from either a low-level or high-level input. Low-level Assembler is an almost one-to-one translation of symbols and mnemonics to machine code whereas high-level languages often compile to object code which is then linked to produce machine code. Interpreted high-level languages are not compiled to machine code but are interpreted by another program, an interpreter, which translates each line of high-level code into the required machine code at runtime. Java, for instance, compiles to byte code suitable for the Java virtual machine. The JVM is a machine code program that interprets the byte code to produce machine-specific machine code. As a result of this interpretation, Java programs are much slower than machine-coded implementations of the same program.
No. Assembly language is a low-level symbolic language that needs to be translated (assembled) to produce the machine code. The reverse of assembly is disassembly, where machine code is disassembled to produce code that is similar to assembly but has no symbolic names or comments. Disassembly is essentially a human-readable version of machine code whereas assembly is the code written by a human in order to produce the machine code, the only language the machine actually understands.