In Argersinger v Hamlin, 407 US 25 (1972) the Court extended the right to court-appointed counsel for any defendant facing jail time, even if the defendant was being charged with a misdemeanor. In previous cases the defendant was only allowed appointed counsel if charged with a felony. This case made sure any defendant facing any loss of liberty had the right to appointed counsel.
No it was not a supreme court case, but a state case because it was held in the local court
chapman won the supreme court case
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
The Supreme Court must have a simple majority to render a decision in a case.
That depends on the case. Often, the state supreme court is the end of the road for a case, making the decision of the state supreme court final and binding. Sometimes cases involved federal questions (issues arising under the US Constitution or federal law) that allow them to be appealed to the US Supreme Court. If the US Supreme Court hears such a case, it may affirm or overturn the state supreme court decision.
Yes, this was later clarified in the Argersinger v Hamlin case. *Note: His case does not apply in a Civil Case when jail time is not involved. (Scott v Illinois.)
Nine.In a 9-0 decision in the case Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 US 25 (1972), the Burger Court expanded the right of court-appointed counsel developed from Gideon v. Wainwright,(1963) to include any defendant facing the possibility of jail or prison time, regardless of the charges against him or her. The Court held any potential deprivation of liberty had to be protected by due process under the Fourteenth Amendment, including the Sixth Amendment right to counsel for those who could not afford it.Chief JusticeWarren BurgerAssociate JusticesWilliam O. Douglas (wrote full opinion)William J. Brennan, Jr.Potter StewartByron WhiteThurgood MarshallHarry BlackmunLouis F. Powell, Jr.William H. Rehnquist
No it was not a supreme court case, but a state case because it was held in the local court
A case on appeal reaches the supreme court if the judges below them cant handle it or that case specifically but it is very hard to get a case on appeal in the supreme court
chapman won the supreme court case
who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
supreme court
There is no case that set up the Supreme Court. The US Supreme Court was required under Article III of the Constitution; Congress created it with the Judiciary Act of 1789.
If the US Supreme Court is the first to hear a case, the Court has original jurisdiction.
S.Ct. is an abbreviation for Supreme Court. S.Ct. indicates the writer is citing a Supreme Court case.
It gave the Supreme Court powers not given by the Constitution.